Article View: cu.motss
Article #100Re: The Case for Gay Marriage - The Nation
From: kevxu
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 00:00
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 00:00
36 lines
2931 bytes
2931 bytes
zmn96 <zmn96@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >You are right religion and choice is one of free will! The question that >has to be asked is.... What would happen to human kind if same sex >marrriage were deemed o.k.? Some fail to realize that you would have no >way of producing off spring for future life. The "logic" escapes me. Why would the legalization of same sex marriage result in the human race having no way to produce offspring in the future? There seems to be an assumption here that heterosexuals are somehow going to become bereft of their affectional and sexual urges if same sex marriage is legalized, not to forget that homosexuals are capable of reproduction as well. >Then we must ask ourselves >do we legalize automatic birth planning methods to satisfy individuals >based upon lifestyle! Can you imagine legalizing breeding FARMS for >individuals who run under the banner of PRIDE! What on earth for? There seems to be some bizarre confusion at work here which confounds sexual orientation and human reproduction and casts them as somehow opposed to boot. >I did not think you needed >to join a PRIDE club. If you don't have pride because you are alive, >then in my opinion you are better off DEAD! The might be said in regard to reasoning power, in which case a valid will and a suicide note are in order. Jack Carroll
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4r6q7t$c7v@mtinsc01-mgt.ops.worldnet.att.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<Pine.GSO.3.93.960613093431.647B-100000@spot.Colorado.EDU> <jgauvin.434.010E0E7B@symbios.com> <31c17fc1.44899013@news.cyberramp.net> <jgauvin.438.006D8992@symbios.com> <31C1AA86.58A322A8@csn.net> <jgauvin.439.004FC25E@symbios.com> <4q57st$ljm@cactus.verinet.com> <31CE1E68.48DC@deltanet.com> <3bjzxAwZqIuG090yn@io.com> <glp-2406960657490001@ppp66.cinenet.net> <jwhitesi-2406962237460001@cnc098063.concentric.net> <4qpqrd$s81@sleddog.fred.net> <31D6A837.5726@ix.netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10be61,754ce52e7af178f X-Google-Attributes: gid10be61,public X-Google-Thread: 108be9,754ce52e7af178f X-Google-Attributes: gid108be9,public X-Google-Thread: 12ce57,754ce52e7af178f X-Google-Attributes: gid12ce57,public X-Google-Thread: 10bb69,754ce52e7af178f X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb69,public X-Google-Thread: 1026d8,754ce52e7af178f X-Google-Attributes: gid1026d8,public X-Google-Thread: f49ec,754ce52e7af178f X-Google-Attributes: gidf49ec,public X-Google-Thread: 1073ca,754ce52e7af178f X-Google-Attributes: gid1073ca,public From: kevxu@worldnet.att.net Subject: Re: The Case for Gay Marriage - The Nation Date: 1996/06/30 Message-ID: <4r6q7t$c7v@mtinsc01-mgt.ops.worldnet.att.net> X-Deja-AN: 162980658 references: <Pine.GSO.3.93.960613093431.647B-100000@spot.Colorado.EDU> <jgauvin.434.010E0E7B@symbios.com> <31c17fc1.44899013@news.cyberramp.net> <jgauvin.438.006D8992@symbios.com> <31C1AA86.58A322A8@csn.net> <jgauvin.439.004FC25E@symbios.com> <4q57st$ljm@cactus.verinet.com> <31CE1E68.48DC@deltanet.com> <3bjzxAwZqIuG090yn@io.com> <glp-2406960657490001@ppp66.cinenet.net> <jwhitesi-2406962237460001@cnc098063.concentric.net> <4qpqrd$s81@sleddog.fred.net> <31D6A837.5726@ix.netcom.com> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: AT&T WorldNet Services mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: cu.motss,co.politics,boulder.general,co.general,soc.motss,co.politics.amend2.discuss,alt.politics.homosexuality x-mailer: Mozilla 1.22ATT (Windows; U; 16bit)