🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <Pine.SOL.3.91.960313103251.3019D-100000@spot.Colorado.EDU>, Mike Mills <mills@spot.Colorado.EDU> says:
>
>
>Bob Cormack seems to be making a crude rationalization for an arbitrarily 
>discriminatory policy.  

<...Rude ranting removed...>

At least my note deserved to be described as rational -- which cannot be 
said for your ill-mannered rant, with its strange combination of blatant
 assertion, straw-man argument and gratuitous personal attack.  Perhaps 
you think that your rudeness covers up the fact that you have virtually 
nothing logical to say?

If you can�t raise your level of discourse to a minimally civil level, 
there doesn�t seem to be much reason to converse.

>
>Your desire to deny this institution to gay, lesbian, and bisexual people 
>really says that you think of them as abnormal and unworthy of such the 
>same symbolic sanction you are willing to grant others.  Why don't you just 
>come out and say that instead of constructing this elaborate rationalization?
>

Your fantasies are taking over, Mike;  come back to Earth.


Bob Cormack