🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: cu.motss
Article #96

Re: The Case for Gay Marriage - The Nation

#96
From: Scott Carpenter
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 00:00
42 lines
3681 bytes
On Fri, 28 Jun 1996 09:58:57 -0700, "R. Carruth" <rcarruth@deltanet.com>
wrote:
>Wrong!  The 1st Amendment says...
>
>	...Congress shall make no law establishing religion or preventing the free exercise
>           thereof...
>
>Notice the keywords here "preventing the free exercise thereof"

Please explain why congress is attempting to pass a law preventing the
religion I follow from following it's tenets and allowing me to marry my
lover.  My religion believes that my partnership is every bit as worthy as
a straight marriage, and the current laws prevent them from giving me the
same recognition.  This is in direct violation of the 1st amendment, and
you seem to staunchly support it, so you should be strongly in favor of my
marriage.  Have you written your congressman about it?

>As far as the divorce/remarriage argument, I think you will find most "religious" people are not 
>happy with the divorce rate.  The Bible states the *only* valid reason for divorce is infidelity.

And you're not fighting to outlaw divorce because _________________?

>He we go again...they don't agree with me so they must hate me!  Would you be offended if I 
>categorically stated that *all* homosexuals HATE *all* people of faith?  I thought you would.

No, I'd just know you were wrong.

/^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\
| "Those who are considering love between men or between woman are |
|  our enemies.  Anything that emasculates our people and that     |
|  makes us fair game for our enemies we reject [.....]            |
|  This we can only do if we exercise moral restraint.  Therefore  |
|  we reject all immorality, especially love between men, because  |
|  it deprives us of our last chance to free our people from the   |
|  chains of slavery which are keeping it fettered today."         |
|  ---American Family Association?  Pat Buchanan?  Family Research |
|     Council?  No, Nazi Party response to a questionaire,         |
|     May 14, 1928                                                 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Scott Carpenter            The views expressed are strictly the  |
| scarpntr@cbvcp.com         views of the author.                  |
\__________________________________________________________________/
Technical Details
Message-ID: <31d57555.7535129@news.3-cities.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <Pine.GSO.3.93.960613093431.647B-100000@spot.Colorado.EDU> <jgauvin.434.010E0E7B@symbios.com> <31c17fc1.44899013@news.cyberramp.net> <jgauvin.438.006D8992@symbios.com> <31C1B67D.41C6@lns534.lns.cornell.edu> <4qq5tj$ddn@homer.alpha.net> <31D40F51.40BF@deltanet.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 108be9,754ce52e7af178f
X-Google-Attributes: gid108be9,public
X-Google-Thread: 10bb69,754ce52e7af178f
X-Google-Attributes: gid10bb69,public
X-Google-Thread: 12ce57,754ce52e7af178f
X-Google-Attributes: gid12ce57,public
X-Google-Thread: f49ec,754ce52e7af178f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf49ec,public
X-Google-Thread: 1073ca,754ce52e7af178f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1073ca,public
X-Google-Thread: 10be61,754ce52e7af178f
X-Google-Attributes: gid10be61,public
X-Google-Thread: 1026d8,754ce52e7af178f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1026d8,public
X-Google-Thread: f744b,754ce52e7af178f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf744b,public
From: scarpntr@3-cities.com (Scott Carpenter)
Subject: Re: The Case for Gay Marriage - The Nation
Date: 1996/06/29
Message-ID: <31d57555.7535129@news.3-cities.com>
X-Deja-AN: 162907588
references: <Pine.GSO.3.93.960613093431.647B-100000@spot.Colorado.EDU> <jgauvin.434.010E0E7B@symbios.com> <31c17fc1.44899013@news.cyberramp.net> <jgauvin.438.006D8992@symbios.com> <31C1B67D.41C6@lns534.lns.cornell.edu> <4qq5tj$ddn@homer.alpha.net> <31D40F51.40BF@deltanet.com>
reply-to: scarpntr@3-cities.com
newsgroups: cu.motss,co.politics,boulder.general,co.general,soc.motss,co.politics.amend2.discuss,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.homosexual