Article View: cu.physics.ugrads
Article #10Re: Can anyone explain the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
From: bp6
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 14:52
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 14:52
83 lines
4365 bytes
4365 bytes
This is a common misconception in quantum mechanics. It's taught in most undergraduate courses and it's only in specialist courses on theoretical physics this seems to be covered. The fact is that ANY two non-commuting variables CANNOT be measured simultaneously - with reprdoducible results. This is easily explained, (I'll miss out the maths for those who havent studied mch linear maths/ QM maths formalism). When we make a measurement of a quantum system in state A (which we assume to be a linear superposition of states) the system "collapses" after the measurement into an eigenvector of variable A. If we now look at a variable B, incompatible with A, we find that the list of possible eigenstates for this variable does not coincide with those of A; i.e they have no common eigenvectors. Whenever we make a measurement of A we drive the system into an eigenvector of A; when we make a measurement of B we similarly drive the state into an eigenvector of B. If the eigenvectors do no co-incide (non-commuting or Incompatible variables) then simultaneous measurement is impossible as we cannot drive the state into two states at once. In reality we can, however, force the measurement. Say we make push a system into stationary eigenstate X of position variable. When we measure position we always get the same measured value x1. If we now make a simultaneous measurement of position and momentum we will likel find position = x1, momentum = p1. If we repeat this experiment many times we find that x1 will stay constant but that the value p1 will be completely random. The statistical spread of p1 will likely be infinite. It seems therefore that mathematically, and physically this type of expreiment is impossible. (If you can try to get hold of a paper by Prof. Ulf Leonhardt [my quantum optics lecturer - in the news a lot due to his work on sonic black holes] you'll see that such measurements might be possible if one is very "fuzzy" as to what simultaneous measurements means). As for the bubble chamber, it is clear that the idea of "trajectory" in quantum mechanics is meaningless. The properties from a bubble chamber are inferred but simultaneous measurement cannot take place. [and as for your question "how do you make a position measurement?" - well I don't - I'm afraid I wouldn't know how :o) I'm a theoretician and leave that up to people who can carry out experiments without breaking the equipment :o) ] Have fun Bob "Charles Francis" <charles@clef.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:<nxRwN7AhJDn8EwnG@clef.demon.co.uk>... > In message <a77sai$4uf$1@sparkie.st-andrews.ac.uk>, bp6 > <bp6@st-andrews.ac.uk> writes > >This was incorrect; clearly (as shown by Jon Von Neumann) > >simultaneous measurements of momentum and position is impossible in > >the first place. Therefore there is no limitng accuracy for such > >impossible measurements. > > And how can you measure the momentum of a particle if you do not know > where it is? Any such measurement, e.g. in a cloud chamber, is a > simultaneous measurement of momentum and position. > > > Regards >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<a7i4k9$d8d$2@sparkie.st-andrews.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!207.217.77.43.MISMATCH!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!logbridge.uoregon.edu!server3.netnews.ja.net!server1.netnews.ja.net!news.st-and.ac.uk!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f4cf3,13665a94fb6ccc98,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf4cf3,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-23 06:55:25 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!207.217.77.43.MISMATCH!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!logbridge.uoregon.edu!server3.netnews.ja.net!server1.netnews.ja.net!news.st-and.ac.uk!not-for-mail From: "bp6" <bp6@st-andrews.ac.uk> Newsgroups: cu.physics.ugrads Subject: Re: Can anyone explain the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 14:52:14 -0000 Organization: University of St Andrews Lines: 86 Message-ID: <a7i4k9$d8d$2@sparkie.st-andrews.ac.uk> Reply-To: "bp6" <faraal@hotmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: res01-bp6.res.st-and.ac.uk X-Trace: sparkie.st-andrews.ac.uk 1016894921 13581 138.251.238.16 (23 Mar 2002 14:48:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.st-andrews.ac.uk NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 14:48:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000