Re: Y2K status of Genera

Article View: cu.slug

Article #179

#179

From: tenagle
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:00

17 lines
1165 bytes

Me thinks that one would have to go out of their way to create a 
Y2K problem in any list processor.

Tim Nagle


Scott McKay wrote:
>     Can anyone tell me anything about the expected Y2K status of Genera
>     8.3??
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Mike Harper

> I bet a dollar it works well.
> 
> Why not set the date to Dec 31 1999 11:55 PM, then hack for a few
> hours?  Then you can tell us all how well, or poorly, it did.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <922231564.11546@news.Colorado.EDU>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <36F7F1B0.BFDEE909@AI.SRI.COM> <9903232023.AA19707@bakura.harlequin.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10077e,9b87392ae1a1896b
X-Google-Attributes: gid10077e,public
From: <tenagle@mmm.com>
Subject: Re: Y2K status of Genera
Date: 1999/03/23
Message-ID: <922231564.11546@news.Colorado.EDU>
X-Deja-AN: 458164976
Distribution: cu
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: daemon@peabody.colorado.edu
References: <36F7F1B0.BFDEE909@AI.SRI.COM> <9903232023.AA19707@bakura.harlequin.com>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Note1: message-id generated by recnews
X-Note2: mail msgid was   <36F81DE4.1553699D@mmm.com>
Organization: University of Colorado at Boulder
Mime-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: cu.slug
NNTP-Posting-User: daemon

Reply to Parent Message