🚀 go-pugleaf

At 15:16 20.04.98 +0000, Peter Paine wrote:

>For me, the hyper-linking offered by the Docex

The Document Examiner is a very good application.

> (and now HTML) is an important aspect. 

I don't like HTML that much. It doesn't know much about
structuring text. Most of the time it is not very
dynamic. If it would come out of a document database
it would be much better. Typical HTML documentations
are static.

>For most uses I think that the Genera Docex would be something to download,
>"app" and data files as a whole.

I would prefer something with a flexible web server. Like
InfoBook based on CL-HTTP. Actually the Document Examiner
data should be rich enough to generate a perfect
HTML-based documentation.

>I don't see the Docex itself being the issue, rather the Genera
>documentation.  Which might help keep SLUG alive by allowing access to new
>users, even evangelise it to some extent.

I agree completely. But who has the time? And the knowledge?