🚀 go-pugleaf

I can sense you are uncomfortable with the subject of women.
I'll acknowledge it's a blow below the belt to start talking
about your love life. 
Please say that you at least verify what you hear on Fox "News"
in the New Republic or similar rag.  I'd sleep better at night
knowing.
Why don't we kick off today on something more timely?
Let's say oh... the white wash job on the budget/tax cut.

Now the whole purpose for the tax cut is to provide
economic stimulus.  So why then were efforts made to
quash a direct rebate of this year's surplus in place
of the back end loaded 11 year plan the GOP house delegation
is trying to shove up our butts?  Let's see... if this
is suppose to be economic stimulus for a down-turning
economy, which would help you to infuse cash into the
economy:  a couple hundred (maybe thousand) bucks rebate in 
your pocket now or the possibility that you might pay lower 
taxes in ten years?  The answer is that a rebate now, while
being more useful for getting cash into the economy and far more
useful to average joe, does nothing to benefit the large
corporate contributors (who almost pay no taxes to start with)
that bought the White House for Dubya.  Well of course,
should you get a rebate if you pay no taxes?
  Now looking at the rest of this 2000+ page behemoth,
I can tell that arithmetic is not the GOP's strong point
but this is so simple even Denny Hastret ought to be
able to see it through his squint-o-vision.  

-John