🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <9cuc7g$ng1$1@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu>,
 John Martin <martin@fafnir.astr.cwru.edu> wrote:

> I can sense you are uncomfortable with the subject of women.
> I'll acknowledge it's a blow below the belt to start talking
> about your love life.

You're the one who seems bringing up the subject of women.  Those of us 
who are secure in our sexuality and our relationships don't feel the 
need to keep discussing it.

> Please say that you at least verify what you hear on Fox "News"
> in the New Republic or similar rag.  I'd sleep better at night
> knowing.

It just kills you to know that Fox News is beating CNN and MSNBC, 
doesn't it?  I know you long for the days when you could peddle 
left-wing tripe unchallenged by the truth.

> Why don't we kick off today on something more timely?
> Let's say oh... the white wash job on the budget/tax cut.
> 
> Now the whole purpose for the tax cut is to provide
> economic stimulus.  So why then were efforts made to
> quash a direct rebate of this year's surplus in place
> of the back end loaded 11 year plan the GOP house delegation
> is trying to shove up our butts?

There you go with the anal fixation again.  Maybe it's you and not 
Gephardt who's suffering from craniorectal implantation.

> Let's see... if this
> is suppose to be economic stimulus for a down-turning
> economy, which would help you to infuse cash into the
> economy:  a couple hundred (maybe thousand) bucks rebate in 
> your pocket now or the possibility that you might pay lower 
> taxes in ten years?  The answer is that a rebate now, while
> being more useful for getting cash into the economy and far more
> useful to average joe, does nothing to benefit the large
> corporate contributors (who almost pay no taxes to start with)
> that bought the White House for Dubya.  Well of course,
> should you get a rebate if you pay no taxes?

Why don't you ask Bush's friend Marc Rich about what happens when you 
don't pay taxes?  Oh, that's right -- Clinton's the one who let Rich off 
the hook for tax evasion and doing business with terrorists, in exchange 
for campaign contributions.

As for tax refunds, I know it just eats at you when Bush talks about 
letting people actually keep the money they earn.  You'd love to have 
the Democrats keep it for themselves; they think it's theirs anyway, so 
why wake them up to reality?

Or are you the one that needs the money so you can buy a love life?

>  Now looking at the rest of this 2000+ page behemoth,
> I can tell that arithmetic is not the GOP's strong point

Funny, they were able to count the many friends of Clinton who were 
convicted, and the amount of money Clinton had to pay for lying under 
oath.

> but this is so simple even Denny Hastret ought to be
> able to see it through his squint-o-vision.  

Squint or no squint, at least he can read and understand English.  You 
guys are still trying to figure out the meaning of "is."

 -- DZ