Thread View: cwru.general
36 messages
36 total messages
Started by Maelstrom
Tue, 04 Nov 2003 01:38
Rats!
Author: Maelstrom
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 01:38
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 01:38
5 lines
1394 bytes
1394 bytes
Anyone notice there is a major rat infestation on the quad? Primarily near baker, and olin. Or are we following CWRU policy and waiting to the very last moment to get something implemented? Like waiting for the rats to appear in the buildings when it starts snowing. Mael
Re: Rats!
Author: Richard F. Drushel
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 02:19
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 02:19
14 lines
1645 bytes
1645 bytes
In cwru.general Maelstrom <Maelstrom@cwru.edu> wrote:
: Anyone notice there is a major rat infestation on the quad? Primarily
: near baker, and olin.
It's a free-range protein supply for the Wood Company. The buggers
are thriving quiite nicely, aren't they?
*Rich*
--
Richard F. Drushel, Ph.D. | "Aplysia californica" is your taxonomic
Department of Biology, Slug Division | nomenclature. / A slug, by any other
Case Western Reserve University | name, is still a slug by nature.
Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7080 U.S.A. | -- apologies to Data, "Ode to Spot"
Re: Rats!
Author: Paul Schneider
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 13:58
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 13:58
23 lines
2028 bytes
2028 bytes
And besides these newsgroups (which no one in facilities or maintenance reads), where else did you report it? Problems get fixed faster if they're reported to something approximating the appropriate person. Hell, even calling the operator and asking for facilities would probably get you in the right direction. I've only seen one rat-like creature around Olin in the past couple of years, and I tend to be around a bit in the evenings on friday and saturday nights (due to film society). How many have you seen? - Paul "Maelstrom" <Maelstrom@cwru.edu> wrote in message news:bo6vuj$i2e$1@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu... > Anyone notice there is a major rat infestation on the quad? Primarily > near baker, and olin. Or are we following CWRU policy and waiting to the > very last moment to get something implemented? Like waiting for the rats > to appear in the buildings when it starts snowing. > Mael >
Re: Rats!
Author: Joel D. Kraft
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 15:26
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 15:26
16 lines
1800 bytes
1800 bytes
The University has a contract with various exterminators to take care of these sorts of things. From teenie creatures to giant ones!! Call 2580, which is the Plant Services Customer Service Center. They should be able to hook you up. Joel PS...They were creeping around Yost last night, too! -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Email : housing@case.edu | Case Western Reserve University Phone : 216-368-3780 | Department of Housing & Residence Life FAX : 216-368-6658 | http://housing.case.edu/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Rats!
Author: Paul Schneider
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 15:31
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 15:31
1 lines
1187 bytes
1187 bytes
With big pointy teeth!
Re: Rats!
Author: Ken Alverson
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 15:35
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 15:35
7 lines
1491 bytes
1491 bytes
"Paul Schneider" <froggy@eecs.cwru.edu> wrote in message news:bo8goh$ktq$1@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu... > With big pointy teeth! What, behind the rabbit? Ken
Re: Rats!
Author: Stephen Trier
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 15:58
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 15:58
14 lines
1379 bytes
1379 bytes
In article <bo8b9u$bpm$1@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu>,
Paul Schneider <froggy@eecs.cwru.edu> wrote:
>How many have you seen?
For what it's worth, I've seen three. One was between Baker and Adelbert,
and two were on the quad near Stro.
Stephen
--
Stephen Trier
Technical Development Lab
Cleveland FES Center
sct@po.cwru.edu
Re: Rats!
Author: Maelstrom
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:03
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 16:03
14 lines
1717 bytes
1717 bytes
Plant services knows about it. I have seen some pretty bigs ones. They make 'Big Ben' look small. (I think that was the name of the big rat in Willard). Mael Maelstrom wrote: > Anyone notice there is a major rat infestation on the quad? Primarily > near baker, and olin. Or are we following CWRU policy and waiting to the > very last moment to get something implemented? Like waiting for the rats > to appear in the buildings when it starts snowing. > Mael >
Re: Rats!
Author: Paul Schneider
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 18:12
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 18:12
4 lines
1250 bytes
1250 bytes
Y'know, if they tore down baker the rats in that building at least would have to go elsewhere.... - Froggy
Re: Rats!
Author: Maelstrom
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 19:14
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 19:14
10 lines
1470 bytes
1470 bytes
Yeah. Aldebert. Paul Schneider wrote: > Y'know, if they tore down baker the rats in that building at least would > have to go elsewhere.... > > - Froggy > >
Re: Rats!
Author: Josh
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 04:51
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 04:51
17 lines
1801 bytes
1801 bytes
3 big bad arse rats spotted tonight running around between bingham and glennan. I hope they don't carry the plague! one ran right up to me till i started stomping after it scaring the crap out of it... Josh "Maelstrom" <Maelstrom@cwru.edu> wrote in message news:bo6vuj$i2e$1@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu... > Anyone notice there is a major rat infestation on the quad? Primarily > near baker, and olin. Or are we following CWRU policy and waiting to the > very last moment to get something implemented? Like waiting for the rats > to appear in the buildings when it starts snowing. > Mael >
Re: Rats!
Author: Paul Schneider
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 20:56
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 20:56
4 lines
1286 bytes
1286 bytes
Methinks it's time to call 2580 until they get so sick of hearing from us that they properly address the problem. - Froggy
Re: Rats!
Author: Maelstrom
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 21:53
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 21:53
11 lines
1678 bytes
1678 bytes
I called them, and they said everything was 'under control'. HA. I've seen a couple more, I swear I saw one eat a cat. What the hell are they eating to get so fricken huge. Paul Schneider wrote: > Methinks it's time to call 2580 until they get so sick of hearing from us > that they properly address the problem. > > - Froggy > >
Re: Rats!
Author: dwh6
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 23:42
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 23:42
9 lines
1839 bytes
1839 bytes
On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 16:53:17 -0500, Maelstrom wrote: > I called them, and they said everything was 'under control'. HA. I've > seen a couple more, I swear I saw one eat a cat. What the hell are they > eating to get so fricken huge. > Mad scientist on campus? ~Dan
Re: Rats!
Author: Andrew Kibler
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:44
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:44
15 lines
1615 bytes
1615 bytes
probably the eggs or newborns of other populations around Maelstrom wrote: > > I called them, and they said everything was 'under control'. HA. I've > seen a couple more, I swear I saw one eat a cat. What the hell are they > eating to get so fricken huge. > > Paul Schneider wrote: > > Methinks it's time to call 2580 until they get so sick of hearing from us > > that they properly address the problem. > > > > - Froggy > > > >
Re: Rats!
Author: Paul Schneider
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 21:59
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 21:59
12 lines
1571 bytes
1571 bytes
"Andrew Kibler" <00@cwru.edu> wrote in message news:3FABBDD6.51A1@cwru.edu... > probably the eggs or newborns of other populations around > > Maelstrom wrote: > > What the hell are they eating to get so fricken huge. The ultimate answer probably lie's somewhere in the bowels of Sodexho.... (Oh come on, you knew that one was coming) - Froggy
Re: Rats!
Author: Josh
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:38
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 13:38
22 lines
2039 bytes
2039 bytes
Paul Schneider wrote: > "Andrew Kibler" <00@cwru.edu> wrote in message > news:3FABBDD6.51A1@cwru.edu... > >>probably the eggs or newborns of other populations around >> >>Maelstrom wrote: >> >>>What the hell are they eating to get so fricken huge. > > > The ultimate answer probably lie's somewhere in the bowels of Sodexho.... > > (Oh come on, you knew that one was coming) > > - Froggy > > > Well then, I guess we'll only have to wait a few hours to get to the bottom of this?
Re: Rats!
Author: John Martin
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:02
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:02
15 lines
1913 bytes
1913 bytes
Maelstrom wrote: > Anyone notice there is a major rat infestation on the quad? Primarily > near baker, and olin. Or are we following CWRU policy and waiting to the > very last moment to get something implemented? Like waiting for the rats > to appear in the buildings when it starts snowing. > Mael > You know discussions like this are exactly why I should keep lurking. I doubt I'd have heard about this reading the alumni magazine. This is real news alumni should know. :) For some reason the alumni mag rather run with "Hundert Prefers Red Kneck Ties" rather than "North End of Quad Overrun By Intelligent Rodents." :P -John
Re: Rats!
Author: steve b
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:36
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:36
2 lines
1286 bytes
1286 bytes
Let's just surrender and build a massive solid gold Rat Shrine on the quad! who's with me?!
Re: Rats!
Author: Maelstrom
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 19:42
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 19:42
6 lines
1491 bytes
1491 bytes
steve b wrote: > Let's just surrender and build a massive solid gold Rat Shrine on the > quad! who's with me?! CASE will change to Nihm. I hope I spelled that right. I haven't read that book (or seen the movie) in eons.
Re: Rats!
Author: the kat
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:24
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:24
14 lines
1560 bytes
1560 bytes
In article <bp0mru$3b2$1@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu>, Maelstrom wrote: > steve b wrote: >> Let's just surrender and build a massive solid gold Rat Shrine on the >> quad! who's with me?! > > CASE will change to Nihm. I hope I spelled that right. I haven't read > that book (or seen the movie) in eons. Nimh -- | A___A _/_ /_ _ / _ _/_ _ ,_ _ | ( @ @ ) (/(/ (/(/ (/(/.( / /(-'/< (_\( . (_) / `(_) | \_^_/ kat at the kat dot org ._/
Re: Rats!
Author: Alison Perera
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:31
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:31
16 lines
1505 bytes
1505 bytes
In article <bp0mru$3b2$1@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu>, Maelstrom <maelstrom!@case.edu> wrote: > steve b wrote: > > Let's just surrender and build a massive solid gold Rat Shrine on the > > quad! who's with me?! > > CASE will change to Nihm. I hope I spelled that right. I haven't read > that book (or seen the movie) in eons. It's NIMH...and Case. Lest anyone perceive the name of the school as an acronym. Enjoy, Alison ams58
Re: Rats!
Author: Stephen Trier
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:31
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:31
10 lines
1344 bytes
1344 bytes
NIMH, the National Institute of Mental Health. http://www.nimh.nih.gov/
Stephen
Followups to cwru.general, please.
--
Stephen Trier
Technical Development Lab
Cleveland FES Center
sct@po.cwru.edu
Re: Rats!
Author: Maelstrom
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 21:24
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 21:24
14 lines
1757 bytes
1757 bytes
Maelstrom wrote: > steve b wrote: > >> Let's just surrender and build a massive solid gold Rat Shrine on the >> quad! who's with me?! > > > CASE will change to Nihm. I hope I spelled that right. I haven't read > that book (or seen the movie) in eons. > In reply to myself. Way to go dumbass; Nimh is how you spell it, and it's Case not CASE or C4S3 cause we do not want to imply there are h4x0rs here. /Doh
Re: Rats!
Author: Tom Trelvik
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:59
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 14:59
16 lines
2055 bytes
2055 bytes
Alison Perera wrote: > ...and Case. Lest anyone perceive the name of the school as an > acronym. You would think so, wouldn't you? But they're actually insisting everybody refer to it (in html, anyway) as CASE, but with the "ase" being in small caps. So all four letters are capitalized, but the C is normal sized while the ASE are smaller. They're very strict about it, we're not allowed to display "Case" any other way unless it's part of the full "Case Western Reserve University" name. Yes, because I'm sure that just looks sooo much better to everybody (and will certainly be the deciding factor for many prospective students). Don't ask me, I don't get it. Tom
Re: Rats!
Author: the kat
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 01:01
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 01:01
19 lines
1873 bytes
1873 bytes
In article <bp2ql2$ef3$1@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu>, Tom Trelvik wrote: > You would think so, wouldn't you? But they're actually insisting > everybody refer to it (in html, anyway) as CASE, but with the "ase" > being in small caps. So all four letters are capitalized, but the C is > normal sized while the ASE are smaller. They're very strict about it, > we're not allowed to display "Case" any other way unless it's part of > the full "Case Western Reserve University" name. so it should be _ / \_ASE if it's just in plain ascii, right? ;) -- | A___A _/_ /_ _ / _ _/_ _ ,_ _ | ( @ @ ) (/(/ (/(/ (/(/.( / /(-'/< (_\( . (_) / `(_) | \_^_/ kat at the kat dot org ._/
Re: Rats!
Author: Richard F. Drushel
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 01:18
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 01:18
19 lines
1958 bytes
1958 bytes
In cwru.general Tom Trelvik <ttt@cwru.edu> wrote:
: But they're actually insisting
: everybody refer to it (in html, anyway) as CASE, but with the "ase"
: being in small caps.
And how, pray tell, are you to do this in nice HTML without
stupid <FONT> tags to change the size?
Include me out. It will stay "CWRU" on my pages :-)
*Rich* (who has taken to calling this place "The University"
instead of "Case")
--
Richard F. Drushel, Ph.D. | "Aplysia californica" is your taxonomic
Department of Biology, Slug Division | nomenclature. / A slug, by any other
Case Western Reserve University | name, is still a slug by nature.
Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7080 U.S.A. | -- apologies to Data, "Ode to Spot"
Re: Rats!
Author: Jeff Hunter
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 02:58
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 02:58
15 lines
1781 bytes
1781 bytes
In article <bp3utu$mat$1@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu>, rfd@po.cwru.edu (Richard F. Drushel) wrote: > : But they're actually insisting > : everybody refer to it (in html, anyway) as CASE, but with the "ase" > : being in small caps. > > And how, pray tell, are you to do this in nice HTML without > stupid <FONT> tags to change the size? By using Cascading Style Sheets, particularly "font-variant:small-caps"? <http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/css/font/font-variant.html> Jeff
Re: Rats!
Author: Paul Jarc
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 07:47
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 07:47
9 lines
1598 bytes
1598 bytes
Tom Trelvik <ttt@cwru.edu> wrote: > But they're actually insisting everybody refer to it (in html, > anyway) as CASE, but with the "ase" being in small caps. CMIIW, but I think small caps is just for title-ish occurrences. Body text occurrences are supposed to be capitalized normally. paul
Re: Rats!
Author: Richard F. Drushel
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 13:06
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 13:06
22 lines
2184 bytes
2184 bytes
In cwru.general Jeff Hunter <jxh106@po.cwru.edu> wrote:
: In article <bp3utu$mat$1@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu>,
: rfd@po.cwru.edu (Richard F. Drushel) wrote:
:> And how, pray tell, are you to do this in nice HTML without
:> stupid <FONT> tags to change the size?
: By using Cascading Style Sheets, particularly "font-variant:small-caps"?
I like my CSS-less vanilla HTML 4.01. My pages pass the checker
at validator.w3.org, too, unlike the University's. The prettier they
get, the less useful they are. But I've said this before :-)
YMMV,
*Rich*
--
Richard F. Drushel, Ph.D. | "Aplysia californica" is your taxonomic
Department of Biology, Slug Division | nomenclature. / A slug, by any other
Case Western Reserve University | name, is still a slug by nature.
Cleveland, Ohio 44106-7080 U.S.A. | -- apologies to Data, "Ode to Spot"
Re: Rats!
Author: Tom Trelvik
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 14:27
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 14:27
8 lines
1885 bytes
1885 bytes
Jeff Hunter wrote: >> And how, pray tell, are you to do this in nice HTML without >>stupid <FONT> tags to change the size? > > > By using Cascading Style Sheets, particularly "font-variant:small-caps"? Yup.
Re: Rats!
Author: Tom Trelvik
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 14:29
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 14:29
8 lines
1699 bytes
1699 bytes
Paul Jarc wrote: > CMIIW, but I think small caps is just for title-ish occurrences. Body > text occurrences are supposed to be capitalized normally. I may be mistaken, but my understanding was that we're to display it that way anytime we use the shortened form of the name. Tom
Re: Rats!
Author: Tom Trelvik
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 14:51
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 14:51
33 lines
3402 bytes
3402 bytes
Richard F. Drushel wrote: > I like my CSS-less vanilla HTML 4.01. My pages pass the checker > at validator.w3.org, too, unlike the University's. The prettier they > get, the less useful they are. But I've said this before :-) Not all of the ITS pages validate, but I have to give major kudos to the guy managing the ITS template now. Some consultants were paid to create a new look and feel for ITS, and give us a template to create that look and feel with. They instead gave us a zip file full of ASP files (which we do not, and will not support), which was full of horrendous code I wouldn't have wanted to touch with a ten foot pole. But he converted it to static html (there was never any reason they needed asp to begin with, they just used it for no apparent reason), cleaned it up, made much more extensive use of CSS, and has actually made an active effort when maintaining the template to keep it validating. With something upper administration is so concerned with, it's rare for them to worry about anything other than how it looks in IE, but he's thrown that logic out and actually attempted to support the standards as best as possible. I *really* respect and appreciate that. And Rich, I love that you prefer standards compliance, and plain vanilla pages, but have you considered looking into the *current* standards? HTML 4.01 is a bit dated nowadays. =p Not to mention it's downright sloppy compared to the stricter syntaxes standardized on now. It makes for much cleaner, less ambiguous markup, that makes me wonder why they ever allowed such loose interpretations of syntax requirements in the past. And CSS is actually pretty cool. =) Looking over your lego lab page (which is much cleaner than most HTML pages), I think you'd only have to change a couple quick things for XHMTL 1.0 Strict. Tom
Case logo (used to be Re: Rats!)
Author: the kat
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 16:43
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 16:43
20 lines
2040 bytes
2040 bytes
In article <bp5d7s$n0a$2@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu>, Tom Trelvik wrote: > Paul Jarc wrote: >> CMIIW, but I think small caps is just for title-ish occurrences. Body >> text occurrences are supposed to be capitalized normally. > > I may be mistaken, but my understanding was that we're to display it > that way anytime we use the shortened form of the name. i've seen both forms... http://www.cwru.edu/webdev/ uses Case (with no smallcaps) http://www.cwru.edu/its/ uses CASE (with a pseudo-smallcaps effect done using font-size (as opposed to smallcaps... odd) so i dont know which form is the "preferred" one -- | A___A _/_ /_ _ / _ _/_ _ ,_ _ | ( @ @ ) (/(/ (/(/ (/(/.( / /(-'/< (_\( . (_) / `(_) | \_^_/ kat at the kat dot org ._/
C<small caps>ASE</small caps>
Author: Stephen Trier
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:04
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 17:04
14 lines
1487 bytes
1487 bytes
In article <bp2ql2$ef3$1@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu>,
Tom Trelvik <ttt@cwru.edu> wrote:
>So all four letters are capitalized, but the C is
>normal sized while the ASE are smaller.
It seems kind of biblical...
Stephen
--
Stephen Trier
Technical Development Lab
Cleveland FES Center
sct@po.cwru.edu
Re: C<small caps>ASE</small caps>
Author: Barry
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:43
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:43
12 lines
1706 bytes
1706 bytes
"Stephen Trier" <sct@po.cwru.edu> wrote in message news:bpav3q$2pn$2@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu... > In article <bp2ql2$ef3$1@eeyore.INS.cwru.edu>, > Tom Trelvik <ttt@cwru.edu> wrote: > >So all four letters are capitalized, but the C is > >normal sized while the ASE are smaller. > > It seems kind of biblical... I AM the CASE, thy University... thou shalt have No Other Universities before Me.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads