Article View: dal.general
Article #437Re: Police RoadBlocks/Checkpoints
From: gman
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:35
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 12:35
38 lines
3546 bytes
3546 bytes
"zeptepe" <zeptepe@neap.net> wrote in message news:<_JJK9.226388$C8.631533@nnrp1.uunet.ca>... > While i haven't experienced one of these new "super" police roadblocks, i > have a big, big problem with them. Is anyone else a little bit troubled by > them? Has anyone gone through one yet and can fill me in on what they're > like? Now some people might say that we need for these in the "War against > Terrorism" (ya right) or the other standard "If you're not doing anything > wrong, then don't worry". The only thing i see is random searches of the > general public. Gives me the feeling of being in some country that's ruled > by the military. What next, checkpoints at Pizza Corner? Travel papers > needed to get to Truro? Probably a bit extreme i realize but it feels like > Canadian's rights are really going downhill lately. Do we really want to > pay taxes for the luxury of someday being randomly searched just because > you're going to visit family in another city? Personally, i'd rather my > tax dollars go to things that really matter to me, like the health care > system. If a cop pulls you over...which they can do without needing any reason...they can demand to see your liscense, registration, insurance and they can check for your safety sticker (assuming you have NS plates). If your car is in an obvious state of disrepair the cops could conduct an isnpection beleiving that the safety sticker is a fraud and remove your car. They can check all of these in their computer and validate all of these documents. They cannot unreasonably search you or your belongings without a warrant. If you happen to fit a description of a bank robber than they will likely arrest you first then search you. If a dog was sniffing your car and they suspected drugs and searched your car any law school student could get you off. A drug sniffing dog is tantamount to an illegal search. One could argue either way but I doubt that it would hold up in court. Most of these roadblocks are to check safety stickers which gives them an excuse to smell inside your car...if they suspect you have been drinking they can ask you for an ALERT test...you can refuse. If they strongly suspect they can issue a breathalyzer demand, you can refuse this but it carries the same penalty as impaired driving. If you know you haven't been drinking take the test, when it comes back with a big fat zero, get the badge number and see a lawyer. An unsubstantiated breathalyzer demand is equivalent to false arrest.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<a82f1ece.0212160435.ded13fa@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<_JJK9.226388$C8.631533@nnrp1.uunet.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f7b9c,5dc2844d329f1549 X-Google-Attributes: gidf7b9c,public X-Google-Thread: fbdd9,5dc2844d329f1549 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbdd9,public X-Google-Thread: 105b91,5dc2844d329f1549 X-Google-Attributes: gid105b91,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-12-16 04:35:24 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: gman99@canada.com (gman) Newsgroups: dal.general,hfx.general,ns.general Subject: Re: Police RoadBlocks/Checkpoints Date: 16 Dec 2002 04:35:24 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Lines: 38 Message-ID: <a82f1ece.0212160435.ded13fa@posting.google.com> References: <_JJK9.226388$C8.631533@nnrp1.uunet.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: 192.128.134.68 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1040042124 2338 127.0.0.1 (16 Dec 2002 12:35:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 16 Dec 2002 12:35:24 GMT