Article View: dal.general
Article #816Re: blizzards unacceptable behaviour
From: Andrew Kerr
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:00
45 lines
3027 bytes
3027 bytes
northern lad (northlad@morpork.free-online.co.uk) wrote: : i happened to work in an isp for a while, so i can tell you for a : fact that this is bull =) they chart everything which goes through : their connections, and they send _nothing_ to microsoft. hell, most : computer savvy people hate microsoft anyway! *grin* : ~daniel : -- Well, I'd like to know what ISP you worked for. I don't know of many ISP's that would monitor all traffic on all ports and refuse to send some. What if they're sending a simple http request on port 80? That's all they'd need to do. Or what if its going out on port 23 (telnet), or 119 (nntp), or 6667 (common IRC port)? None of these ports are normally watched for anything.. and the overhead this would put on a server would require you to have a lot of extra processing power. Besides, if an ISP is monitoring all this crap, then I sure as hell don't want to use them. I spend a lot of time telnetting, and using rare ports for special web pages or things like VNC (virtual network computing). I also am typing my passwords for all these. If they're sniffing out my packets, then they can get my passwords. This is unacceptable. And what about mail...? Does this ISP record all mail? Do they read they're users mail? This is an invasion of privacy. I'm probably getting myself worked up over nothing. I highly doubt you understand the ramifications of what you said. No ISP would "stop" something like this from going to MS. They send "_nothing_" to MS. Does this mean I can't go to MS's homepage (this requrires sending an http request)? Does this mean I can't send email to MS? If the above sounded like a flame, it probably was. But as a rule, ISPs woldn't care if this kind of traffic went through they're systems or not. Andrew -- Andrew Kerr Technical Analyst / System Professional Phone# 777-8537 Check out Laugh it Up! Huge collection of Humour: http://tdi.uregina.ca/~kerr Email: kerr@tdi.uregina.ca When it rains, why don't sheep shrink? silent?
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<75e4ub$l8m$1@sue.cc.uregina.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<366498A8.DEEE7E70@stmarys.ca> <xg192.311$ww5.27259@homer.alpha.net> <74k4n3$10e$1@winter.news.rcn.net> <3671bb32.10258991@enews.newsguy.com> <3677f816.24694850@usenet.force9.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101711,87676a16e27f8075 X-Google-Attributes: gid101711,public X-Google-Thread: 10acdc,87676a16e27f8075 X-Google-Attributes: gid10acdc,public X-Google-Thread: 105b91,87676a16e27f8075 X-Google-Attributes: gid105b91,public X-Google-Thread: f9e73,87676a16e27f8075 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9e73,public From: kerr@cs.uregina.ca (Andrew Kerr) Subject: Re: blizzards unacceptable behaviour Date: 1998/12/18 Message-ID: <75e4ub$l8m$1@sue.cc.uregina.ca> X-Deja-AN: 423680142 References: <366498A8.DEEE7E70@stmarys.ca> <xg192.311$ww5.27259@homer.alpha.net> <74k4n3$10e$1@winter.news.rcn.net> <3671bb32.10258991@enews.newsguy.com> <3677f816.24694850@usenet.force9.net> Followup-To: dal.general,alt.games.starcraft,alt.games.warcraft,alt.games.warcraft.draenor Organization: University of Regina Newsgroups: dal.general,alt.games.starcraft,alt.games.warcraft,alt.games.warcraft.draenor