🚀 go-pugleaf

So how much "discussion" do we have to generate to appease the
internet gods? (or to so aggravate dc.bikers that they will run us
into dc.urban-planning on a rail? (G)

-BER

Tiny Human Ferret wrote:

> Michael Malak wrote:
> >
> > Crossposted: dc.biking,dc.driving,dc.general,dc.config
> >
> > OK, it's been nearly a year since my failed attempt to get
> > dc.urban-planning approved.  So let's try again -- those who have been
> > concerned with cross-posts to dc.driving and dc.biking should not let
> > the discussion in dc.config die this time.  This is your chance to
> > change the situation.
> >
> >                      REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
> >                  unmoderated group dc.urban-planning
> >
> > This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) for the creation of a
> > regional unmoderated Usenet newsgroup dc.urban-planning. This is not
> > a Call for Votes (CFV); you cannot vote at this time.
> > Procedural details are below.
> >
>
> I heartily approve. This is long overdue.
>
> --
>                     "We look through a glass but darkly:
>                  What we see is more colored by our beliefs,
>                than what we believe is colored by what we see."