🚀 go-pugleaf

On Wed, 08 Jul 1998 01:40:35 -0400, Tony Wang <tonyw44@prodigy.net.nospam> wrote:
>
>
>Rahul Dhesi wrote:
>
>> This assumes there is sufficient room on the highway to hold all
>> vehicles at safe following distances while still leaving the leftmost
>> lane nearly empty.  It also assumes that repeated lane changes do not
>> increase the chances of an accident.  It also assumes (when there are
>> two lanes of traffic in your direction) that highway onramps are long
>> enough to let merging traffic easily accelerate to highway speed before
>> it gets on the highway, thus allowing normal highway traffic to safely
>> drive at a steady highway speed in the rightmost lane.
>>
>> None of these three assumptions are true in most urban parts of
>> California.
>
>And California would be different than the rest of the country in this
>regard because?
>
>Plus, last time I checked, the interstates in San Diego and Los Angeles all
>had multiple lanes -- as in more than two.  Come to think of it, the ones I
>drove on had like four or five.
>
>So you mean to tell me that you can't leave that left lane alone except for
>passing?  Bull.

Spoken like a true furriner.

>
>--
>Tony Wang
>http://www.geocities.com/colosseum/2544
>
>Remove the nospam from my name to send me mail
>
>


-- 
These opinions are my own and not necessarily those of Information Quest or 
Pebble In The Sky http://www.informationquest.com mailto:jgarry@nospameiq.com
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/joel_garry   Remove nospam to reply.  
mailto:joel_garry@compuserve.nospam.com  "See your DBA?"  I AM the @#%*& DBA!