🚀 go-pugleaf

On Mon, 06 Jul 1998 23:51:08 GMT, in@the.sig (E. Faubion) wrote:

>>>Newton's Three Laws of Motion and derivatives.
>>Ooh, ahh, high school stuff.
>Isaac Newton stuff.

Indeed, and nowadays part of every college-bound high-schooler's basic
education.  You must have missed high school.

>It's already been checked by dozens of experts but thanks for the
>offer.

If it's been checked, than you should have no fear of letting us see the core
calculations here.  But I can tell you're already quaking in your boots.  

Ladies and gentleman, Emporer Earl has no clothes!  A so-called expert who
won't or can't even support his work and claims in a public forum.  A so called
expert who gets all in a lather when others question his reasoning,
methodology, or data;  an "expert" who resorts to name calling and ridicule
against any opponent who doesn't take his claims and dogmatic opinions as fact.

You, Earl, are most certainly not a scientist, student of physics, an
intellectual, or even a professional.  Frankly, at this point I'd be pretty
surprised if you were actually a cop, let alone an "investigator."  If you are,
the intellectual bar must be awfully low in the fine state of Oklahoma.

>>>>*I* could write program that takes inputs and spits out numbers,
>>>>but that doesn't mean that the computations are correct and that the results
>>>>are what they claim to be.
>>>
>>>Then do it.
>>
>>What kind of response was that?
>
>A challenge.  And it's no surprise you're already backing down.  

A challange?  Can't you read?  I will restate the point here in a more clear
fashion, so even you can get it:  Anybody can write a "program" that alleges to
perform a certain function.  That doesn't mean that it truly does as
advertised.  Excellent and obviously correct source code would strongly
buttress your claims to having some concept of physics, but you go limp at the
mere thought of exposing the rusty clockwork of your mind to such inspection.
This is almost too amusing for words!  :)

>>That's it, just one?  Their web site (http://www.lawandordermag.com/ ) is
>>useless (broken links and no archives earlier than this Spring).
>
>Another nerd too incompetent to find anything if it isn't online.
>How nice.

Incompetent, this coming from a creaky old dodder in America's wasteland who's
life's big accomplishment is (or so it is claimed) the authorship of a toy
GwBasic program (later ported to C -- oooh, ahhh!).  ROTFL. !

Ladies and gentleman of the jury...this fine fellow is a laughingstock.  Too
bad, as we've had some good debate on the topic of speed and it would have been
very illuminating to have had a real cop and investigator in on the
conversation.  Oh well, perhaps one will join in eventually.

Cheers,
Eric