🚀 go-pugleaf

On Fri, 03 Jul 1998 04:50:00 GMT, Scott Weiser <weiser@dimensional.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 03 Jul 1998 00:26:13 GMT, joelga@pebble.org (Joel Garry)
>wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 02 Jul 1998 03:26:30 GMT, Scott Weiser <weiser@dimensional.com> wrote:
>>>On Wed, 01 Jul 1998 17:05:08 GMT, grimrod@mindless.moc (Brandon
>>>Sommerville) wrote:
>>>
>>>>Scott Weiser wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>I break at least one law a day.  I don't know anyone that drives every
>>>>>>>>day that doesn't break at least one law a day.  Everything is already
>>>>>>>>illegal, so why would they need any more laws to make criminals out of
>>>>>>>>us?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The question is whether you do it inadvertently or deliberately.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Why does that matter?  What would it signify for each of the answers?
>>>>>
>>>>>Because if it's deliberate, you need to be in jail.
>>>>
>>>>For speeding?  That's a little extreme, isn't it?
>>>
>>>Not in my book.  I've dragged too many dead bodies out of smashed cars
>>>to have the least bit of sympathy for deliberate speeders.
>>
>>So, basically, you have an extremely biased point of view.  Nothing wrong
>>with that.
>
>Correct.
>
>>Just don't impose it on anyone else.
>
>I do so all the time.  I used to get to stop them and write the ticket
>myself.  Now I have to be satisfied with calling them in and offering
>to testify.

So you are saying that in your experience as a peace officer, you were 
extremely biased and performed your duties accordingly.  Now, you give
biased testimony.  Oooooooooooookaaaaaaaaaayyyyy...

>
>When it comes to scofflaw speeders, I go to great pains to impose it
>on them, and always will.

The basic problem here is scofflaw.  I still have a great deal of difficulty
considering 66 in a 65 zone out in the desert on a clear day with no traffic
much of a scoff.  Yet CHP gives out tickets for it under a "zero-tolerance"
policy.

Personally, I consider such biased attitudes and extreme diligence 
counter-productive to any reasonable aims.

It confirms many peoples suspicions that police are not out to help or protect,
but rather to harass, annoy, and fine.

It makes criminals out of ordinary people, arbitrarily.

It is, on its face, anti-American and fascist.

Therefore, you are anti-American and fascist.  And even worse, you do it
in the name of the law-abiding.

>
>Regards,
>
>Scott Weiser
>
>******
>"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend upon my
>friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!"
>******
>http://www.dimensional.com/~weiser/
>
>Copyright 1998 by Scott Weiser
>
>Under the UCC, by the act of transmitting any commercial 
>e-mail advertisment to this address, you are expressly 
>contracting with me in my professional capacity for a 
>consultation on the ad's effectiveness and you expressly 
>agree to pay to me the sum of $250.00 for each such 
>consultation within 10 days of my report to the original 
>sending address.  You further expressly agree that all 
>actions for recovery of fees owed shall be subject solely 
>to the laws of the State of Colorado, which shall have 
>sole jurisdiction.


-- 
These opinions are my own and not necessarily those of Information Quest or 
Pebble In The Sky http://www.informationquest.com mailto:jgarry@nospameiq.com
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/joel_garry   Remove nospam to reply.  
mailto:joel_garry@compuserve.nospam.com  "See your DBA?"  I AM the @#%*& DBA!