Article View: dc.driving
Article #13088Daily gripe: interstates vs secondary roads
From: Walt Horning
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 00:00
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 00:00
47 lines
3015 bytes
3015 bytes
I just hate it when I hear people say how dangerous interstates are (and thus resist higher speed limits). Not too long ago I read in Time Magazine an article that gave the statistics. Interstates take 9% of lives per miles driven versus secondary roads that take 89%. So which is safer? It just like the misconception about air travel, that its safer than driving yourself. The misconception about interstates is so bad, I know people who actually take secondary roads for long distance travel of hundreds of miles and more. But why are secondary roads so dangerous? One cause is driving on a 50 mph road with head-on traffic just a few feet away. Put another way, a collision is easily under 1 second from happening. Not enough time to react. The combined speed: 100 mph. But on an interstate where there is a center barrier or wide grassy strip, such accidents are very rare. Which makes me wonder why some people think its not safe to drive 100 mph on the interstate. After all, they somehow feel 50 mph is safe on secondary roads, but somehow lack the reasoning that 50 + 50 = 100. On an interstate, to do what can be done on a secondary road at 50 mph, you have to drive at 100 mph on an interstate and run into a car parked on the shoulder. But there are so few of these as to be insignificant. Now I will accept the concept that some parts of interstates have sharp hills or sharp curves and safe speeds need to be lower, but on the straight-aways, 100 or more is no big deal. Interestingly, they drive 100+ mph (160+ kph) in Germany all the time and their death-rate per miles driven adjusted for all factors except speed itself, is a fraction of percent lower. Another reason for more death on secondary roads, is at-grade crossings. This is something interstates lack. People who pull out from a secondary road onto a 50 mph highway and get hit in the side stand a good chance of dying, and often do. Interstate have merge ramps, not at-grade crossings. There are many more reasons, but one final one is that secondary roads tend to have far more blinds spots (curves, bushes & trees, houses and buildings too close to the road, parked vehicles at intersections, etc.) Interstates (most of them) are designed to have a clearer field of view. If I had to choose between having to drive at say 120 mph on an open interstate, and driving 50 mph on any secondary road, guess which one I would pick.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<36ad0436.380935@news.pipeline.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,e5c828552fedb225,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public From: whorning@pipeline.com (Walt Horning) Subject: Daily gripe: interstates vs secondary roads Date: 1999/01/25 Message-ID: <36ad0436.380935@news.pipeline.com> X-Deja-AN: 436894211 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: MindSpring Enterprises, Inc. X-Server-Date: 25 Jan 1999 23:48:21 GMT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: whorning@pipeline.com Newsgroups: dc.driving