Re: Route 81 Problems Again

Article View: dc.driving

Article #13195

#13195

From: ken$corn
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 00:00

15 lines
1321 bytes

In dc.driving shane@ibm.net wrote:

: I thought the ban was due to the fact (fiction?) that the road isn't rated
: for more than 5 tons GVW in the left lane.  This was supposedly because the
: left lane is a retrofitted shoulder lane on the Beltway between I-270 and
: I-95, and for most of I-95 up to Delaware.

If it had been due to that, why would they have allowed trucks there in
the first place?  Or for that matter why build a subpar lane in the first
place?  

-- 
Kenneth T. Cornelius  
kencorn@clark.net

Technical Details

Message-ID: <77alpc$uuc$2@callisto.clark.net>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<36931C18.7BC4@ix.netcom.com> <KCLk2.1052$Vu6.1517948@newshog.newsread.com> <770250$4ip$2@callisto.clark.net> <3696c874.19646008@enews.newsguy.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 101049,d51225d01e68264c
X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public
X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,d51225d01e68264c
X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public
X-Google-Thread: fb785,d51225d01e68264c
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb785,public
From: ken$corn@clark.net
Subject: Re: Route 81 Problems Again
Date: 1999/01/10
Message-ID: <77alpc$uuc$2@callisto.clark.net>
X-Deja-AN: 430923127
References: <36931C18.7BC4@ix.netcom.com> <KCLk2.1052$Vu6.1517948@newshog.newsread.com> <770250$4ip$2@callisto.clark.net> <3696c874.19646008@enews.newsguy.com>
Organization: Clark Internet Services, Inc., Ellicott City, MD USA
User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-980105 (UNIX) (SunOS/5.6 (sun4u))
Newsgroups: dc.driving,dc.general,va.general

Reply to Parent Message