🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <359b0825.47344280@news.okc.oklahoma.net>,
   in@the.sig (E. Faubion) wrote:
>John Miles <jmiles@pop.net> wrote:
>
>>The trouble is, this particular study lacks the information needed to
>>draw either conclusion.
>
>Only if you let your bias get in the way.
>
>>Can you understand that?  Or did they teach you in grade school to
>>compare fractions by the magnitude of their numerators?
>
>They taught me to be objective and not let personal bias interfer with
>my thinking.
>
>>If by "excessive speed," you mean "driving in a manner inappropriate for
>>the conditions," sure.  Agreed 100%, no argument here.
>
>And many of those are people intentionally violating a posted speed
>limit.  You can't divorce the two.  This is a common error made by the
>pro-speed crowd. 
>

Yes you can, Earl, both ways. In some situations, you could be both exceeding 
the speed limit and driving too fast for the conditions. In other situations, 
you can be driving below the speed limit, but driving too fast for the 
conditions. Exceeding the speed limit is not a necessary condition for driving 
too fast for the conditions. OTOH, driving too fast for conditions need not 
entail exceeding the speed limit. Sounds like a divorce to me:)

Dennis