🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <303vc9$sp5@clarknet.clark.net> kingg@clark.net (unidentified bass player) writes:
}Judith Cookson Grunberger (jcookson@eng.umd.edu) wrote:
}: 	I have talked to several people about this, and they all have 
}: different opinions.  OK, here's what happened:
}
}[here there be editing]
}
}: 	Info, anyone?
}
}Depends on whether or not the person in the third car stopped as well. 
}Would they be available as witnesses?
}
}Also, consider this: If he's a Pizza Hut delivery boy, the chances 
}are good that he was driving without business use insurance (e.g. if 
}you're using your car to produce income, your insurance carrier likes 
}to know so they can screw you accordingly.) If that's the case, he'd be 
}a damn fool to try and take anyone to court...especially someone who 
}didn't even hit his car.

Men under 30 in MD get screwed regardless of use.  Only once you get
past the last 'scum' category (unmarried male under 30, married male
under 25, female under 21) does use matter at all.  So unless this is
an exceptionally old Pizza Hut carrier, the use won't matter.



-- 
Matthew T. Russotto	russotto@eng.umd.edu
Some news readers expect "Disclaimer:" here.
Just say NO to police searches and seizures.  Make them use force.
(not responsible for bodily harm resulting from following above advice)