Re: Someone adopts warning sign idea! Deta

Article View: dc.driving

Article #21298

#21298

From: Dan J. James
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 1994 16:21

13 lines
1081 bytes

>I've waited thru my share of checkpoints, and I believe its a 
>small and tolerable inconvenience, especially considering the 
>damage that can be inflicted by a drunk driver.
>

 I agree 100%.  I've only seen 1 sobriety checkpoint in MD.  It was
on 270N near Urbana and suprisingly, 1 mile before the checkpoint was
an official looking sign indicating that a checkpoint was ahead.
Even more surprising, there was an exit between the sign and the
checkpoint.  Why bother one wonders.

Djj

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1994Jun23.162100.13032@fsd.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!psinntp!fsd.com!nobody

References: <1994Jun20.231520.24558@almserv.uucp>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,804304021f201e7f
X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-06-24 14:09:58 PST
Newsgroups: dc.driving
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!uunet!psinntp!fsd.com!nobody
From: djames@fsd.com (Dan J. James)
Subject: Re: Someone adopts warning sign idea!  Deta
Message-ID: <1994Jun23.162100.13032@fsd.com>
Sender: nobody@fsd.com
Reply-To: djames@fsd.com
Organization: Fairchild Defense
References: <1994Jun20.231520.24558@almserv.uucp>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 1994 16:21:00 GMT
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message