🚀 go-pugleaf

DFToyama wrote:

> In article <74kde8$sjr$1@samba.rahul.net>, c.c.eiftj@22.usenet.us.com
> says...
> > In <366DAF31.7103@xix.netcom.com> Mike Smith <m-smith@xix.netcom.com> writes:
> >
> > >Absolutely wrong, Rahul. Used as Brandon describes, both lanes would be
> > >in constant use. Everyone could go at their own pace and no-one would
> > >have to wait for some inconsiderate soul blocking the overtaking lane
> > >until a gap opened up in the "wrong" lane. I too have seen such traffic.
> > >It is happy, happy happy and COMPLETELY safe. Won't happen here though!
> >
> > All this will happen if you have only half as much traffic as will take
> > two lanes.  If the left lane has very few vehicles in it, traffic
> > capacity is cut down sharply.  There is no way around this.
> >
> > I don't see such spare highway capacity here in the Bay Area.  Are you
> > in the boonies somewhere?
> > --
> > Rahul Dhesi <dhesi@spams.r.us.com>
>
> Whenever I drove 280 around the Cupertino area, the left lane was usually
> open, allowing me to pass the cars on the right lanes.  I would usually
> do 80+ MPH, and I wasn't even among the fastest.  And those in front of
> me would quickly move over for me.  For someone like me who lives in
> Seattle, that was a very pleasanat surprise.

I was in Canada recently. They still do that there. Not the greatest drivers in the
world but they do respect the left lane as the fast lane. Whoever is slower, moves
to the right. It's a beautiful thing. No flashing of the lights required. ;)
----

Frenchy
________________________________________________________________

Frenchys prediction of the day: ( If you aren't following the Impeachment hearings,
skip this)

Richard Ben Veniste ( Defender of the Bonnano crime family and now one of Clintons)
was caught in a possible perjurious answer.When asked of morning telephone
conferences between the Clinton administration, himself and other media hacks
posing as Professors with the aim of perpetrating lies to the public through the
spin of the day, Richard was evasive and lost his recollection. Allegedly, these
conferences are *ongoing*. If true, I expect Bob Barr and others to encourage
indictments for perjury against Richard.
The political tea leaves have taken a sour turn for Clinton and the leak tap
regarding China and abuses of power is now at full open as well. Contempt charges
against General Reno are back on the table.
Letters of Caution issued to Military Officers for having spoken against Clinton
publicly have opened Foreign policy leaks to a flow, until now, unseen.

Frenchys prediction: Clinton resigns by June1999.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------