Article View: dc.driving
Article #4Re: HOV and why it shouldn't be!
From: Russ Smith
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 17:33
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 17:33
47 lines
2336 bytes
2336 bytes
Some real numbers amusingly observed while stewing in my own juices on the DTR:
Time: 07:15 -- 07:55; ~40 minutes
Distance: From before the Fairfax County Parkway to the final toll plaza,
say 8.5 miles.
Traffic condition: HOV lane - almost full speed (cars slower due to natural caution).
Non-HOV - bumper-to-bumper stop-and-go.
[an aside: Traffic condition prior to start of HOV: all lanes full speed.]
Some number crunching: Assume 53 linear feet per non-HOV-lane car. That's 100
cars per mile per lane. 2 Lanes. 8.5 miles.
That's about 2500 cars per hour, extrapolated out.
Each taking ~40 minutes rather than the "normal" 10.
That's city-gas-mileage, not highway.
In the HOV-lane, 130 vehicles pass during the same 40 minute
period. 74 are HOV-compliant, 56 are not. Assume they're all
HOV-compliant.
That's about 200 cars per hour, extrapolated out.
Each taking ~10 minutes. Each at highway-mileage efficiency.
Real numbers.
On another day (yesterday), 36 HOV-compliant pass, 13 non-HOV-compliant. Driving time
was ~35 minutes for non-HOV-lanes. Backed up distance was about a mile less due to speed
pickup near the main toll plaza (though the backup started before the FCP).
Real numbers.
Something isn't computing here; the new situation is BETTER for the environment? Even
over the LONG term?
Pooh.
Russ <Smith@ur-guh.com>
A consultant who pools with his consultant wife right now but won't soon and
can't easily with others who aren't strangers (and, as an aside, one who has
NEVER had a job which looked kindly on prompt departures from work for ANY
reason -- meetings always seem to overhang those 4 and 5 pm time boundaries).
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep11.173350.29170@almserv.uucp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!almserv!usenetReferences:
<24822@oasys.dt.navy.mil>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: dc.driving Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!almserv!usenet From: smith@ur-guh.com (Russ Smith) Subject: Re: HOV and why it shouldn't be! Message-ID: <1992Sep11.173350.29170@almserv.uucp> Sender: usenet@almserv.uucp Nntp-Posting-Host: cheers Reply-To: smith@ur-guh.com Organization: Ur-Guh Complex Inc. References: <24822@oasys.dt.navy.mil> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 17:33:50 GMT Lines: 49