Article View: dc.driving
Article #585Re: Driving Like There Was No Tomorrow
From: Josh Turner
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 00:00
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 00:00
67 lines
4324 bytes
4324 bytes
Scott M. Kozel wrote: > > Josh Turner <shua@umich.edu> wrote: > > > > Scott M. Kozel wrote: > > > > > Highway patrolmen said that the car literally painted itself onto > > > the wall. > > > > "The first trooper that examined the wreckage was so sickened by what he > > > saw that he vomited his guts out". > > > > > > That taken literally would suggest that his guts literally came out, > > > which they didn't, only the contents of his stomach came out. But the > > > term "vomit your guts out" is an English idiom, which depicts violent > > > regurgitation. > > > > I have no problem with idioms, or colorful figures of speech. I > > certainly don't beleive that everything > > that everyone says should be taken literally. However, here the officer, > > by using the word "literally", was suggesting that this statement > > *should be* taken literally. Had the officer simply said "The car > > painted itself onto the wall," that would have been fine, as a > > figurative, graphic illustration of the violence of the event. > > You misspelled "believe". Oops. No spell checker in Netscape News. > I think you should blame me, not the cop. The word "literally" was (I'm > almost sure) MY embellishment to the article. > > But you wanted to blame the cop, didn't you? ??? Why would I want to blame the cop? I thought I was being rather polite by assuming that the cop had made the error, rather than you. > And with all that they had been through (after all one of them spewed), > can they be forgiven if one of them made a slight English mistake? > > The world wonders. Erm, I thought you just said that he was not the one who made the mistake. > > Likewise, > > had he said "He vomited his guts out--literally," I would have taken > > issue with that, because presumably the officer did not actually eject > > his intestines through his mouth. > > I hope not. > > > Using the word "literally" is a signal that what it refers to *is not* a > > figure of speech, or a hyperbole, or an exaggeration, or a metaphor, or > > a simile, or anything else; it is a signal that the event described, > > despite sounding incredible, actually occurred. To whit: "He ate 23 > > hamburgers--literally", or "He is literally the worst golf player I have > > ever seen," or "you are literally the only person I know that doesn't > > like the way the Contour handles." > > Relax. > > What's wrong with having some fun with the English language? As I said before, it's a pet peeve of mine. And I'm perfectly relaxed.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<35B53E4C.4D1A@umich.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<359a73ba.9342949@news.okc.oklahoma.net> <6nep33$q0_001@dwt.csiro.au> <359b067b.46917870@news.okc.oklahoma.net> <6np53n$1bc_002@dwt.csiro.au> <35a023c2.32370521@news.okc.oklahoma.net><6ns21i$220_001@dwt.csiro.au> <35a26105.4394501@news.okc.oklahoma.net> <6o1297$1p0_006@dwt.csiro.au> <35a487e6.58298651@news.okc.oklahoma.net> <6o3r14$3jc_002@dwt.csiro.au> <35a5ccd5.55385857@news.okc.oklahoma.net> <6obnr5$1p4_003@dwt.csiro.au> <35aa4795.2797214@news.okc.oklahoma.net> <35ac8e23.32015778@news.v-wave.com> <35aae90f.44141803@news.okc.oklahoma.net> <35B07DCA.426@richmond.infi.net> <35B1012A.60AA@umich.edu> <35B179AF.15E9@richmond.infi.net> <35B286AC.57C7@umich.edu> <35B2A244.2E84@richmond.infi.net> <35B2B2B6.7E7@umich.edu> <35B4077D.2585@richmond.infi.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fb1cb,a813ba40692ae7c2 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1cb,public X-Google-Thread: 1038e3,a813ba40692ae7c2 X-Google-Attributes: gid1038e3,public X-Google-Thread: 10001a,a813ba40692ae7c2 X-Google-Attributes: gid10001a,public X-Google-Thread: 10e16d,a813ba40692ae7c2 X-Google-Attributes: gid10e16d,public X-Google-Thread: 1011e5,a813ba40692ae7c2 X-Google-Attributes: gid1011e5,public X-Google-Thread: f4d80,a813ba40692ae7c2 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d80,public From: Josh Turner <shua@umich.edu> Subject: Re: Driving Like There Was No Tomorrow Date: 1998/07/22 Message-ID: <35B53E4C.4D1A@umich.edu> X-Deja-AN: 373691399 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <359a73ba.9342949@news.okc.oklahoma.net> <6nep33$q0_001@dwt.csiro.au> <359b067b.46917870@news.okc.oklahoma.net> <6np53n$1bc_002@dwt.csiro.au> <35a023c2.32370521@news.okc.oklahoma.net><6ns21i$220_001@dwt.csiro.au> <35a26105.4394501@news.okc.oklahoma.net> <6o1297$1p0_006@dwt.csiro.au> <35a487e6.58298651@news.okc.oklahoma.net> <6o3r14$3jc_002@dwt.csiro.au> <35a5ccd5.55385857@news.okc.oklahoma.net> <6obnr5$1p4_003@dwt.csiro.au> <35aa4795.2797214@news.okc.oklahoma.net> <35ac8e23.32015778@news.v-wave.com> <35aae90f.44141803@news.okc.oklahoma.net> <35B07DCA.426@richmond.infi.net> <35B1012A.60AA@umich.edu> <35B179AF.15E9@richmond.infi.net> <35B286AC.57C7@umich.edu> <35B2A244.2E84@richmond.infi.net> <35B2B2B6.7E7@umich.edu> <35B4077D.2585@richmond.infi.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: shua@umich.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 1998 21:25:26 EDT Newsgroups: dc.driving,rec.autos.driving,misc.legal,alt.law-enforcement,seattle.general,ca.driving