Re: HOV and why it shouldn't be!

Article View: dc.driving

Article #6

From: Stuart Mennitt
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 1992 13:55

19 lines
1292 bytes

In dc.driving, mulvihil@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Lawrence Mulvihill) writes:
>
>This HOV-3 thing works great.  Maybe it should be instituted
>on the Beltway as well.

    Don't be so short-sighted Lair, It would be completely possible
to engineer cars so they wouldn't start unless three or more persons
were inside, with their seatbelts fastened, and their brain wave monitors
were reporting that all were thinking "Happy Happy, Joy Joy", "I shalt
not Speed", etc.

>Happy Motoring!
Definitely!!
--____________________________________________________
]      Stu Mennitt      smennitt@oasys.dt.navy.mil    [
]  NavSurfWarCen, CarderockDiv     Bethesda, Maryland [
]         was: David Taylor Research Center           [
]     was: David Taylor Naval Ship R&D Center         [
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Technical Details

Message-ID: <24952@oasys.dt.navy.mil>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!oasys!smennitt

References: <24822@oasys.dt.navy.mil> <24948@oasys.dt.navy.mil>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!oasys!smennitt
From: smennitt@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Stuart Mennitt)
Newsgroups: dc.driving
Subject: Re: HOV and why it shouldn't be!
Message-ID: <24952@oasys.dt.navy.mil>
Date: 12 Sep 92 13:55:38 GMT
References: <24822@oasys.dt.navy.mil> <24948@oasys.dt.navy.mil>
Reply-To: smennitt@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Stuart Mennitt)
Distribution: usa
Organization: NavSurfWarCen, CarderockDiv (ex-"Taylor Model Basin")
Lines: 19

Reply to Parent Message