🚀 go-pugleaf

E. Faubion wrote:

>grimrod@mindless.com (Brandon Sommerville) wrote:
>
>>>Oops.... I shouldn'ta done that.... lemme edit that out and try again.
>
>>That's what the following distance is for...
>
>Brandon misses another one.    Sheeshhhh!

Didn't miss anything.  Any time I've made an error, my following
distance has allowed me to compensate.  It's also allowed me to
compensate for other drivers' errors.

>>>As for me?  I'm going to tag them all.... 
>
>>Unless they have a badge.  Come on Earl, you said you appreciated
>>honesty, how about demonstrating it.
>
>Tagging as in stopping them.  Whether I cite is my business not yours.

What's the ratio of civilians stopped vs stopped and ticketed?  What's
the ratio when it's cops stopped?

>But like I said before, as soon as you start snitching off on your
>coworkers for misdemeanors, so will I.   Until then........ happy
>trails!

You never told me what misdemeanors all my coworkers are committing.
Asides from that, it isn't my job to stop them.  Worse than that, if
it was my job to enforce rules and I broke them with immunity, I sure
wouldn't get a lot of respect.

>>>and, oh, BTW, after many
>>>years of investigating crashes I have a pretty fair idea of what is
>>>dangerous and what isn't.   
>
>>Is your family doctor a pathologist?  If not, do you go to a
>>pathologist for advice on how to stay healthy?  If not, why not?
>
>I realize you don't believe me.   By now you should also realize I
>don't give a rodent's rump whether you do or not.   You should have
>been on the OJ Jury.  You'd have fit right in.
>
>The statement stands.  Now you have a nice day, ya' hear?

Why not answer the question?  Is your family doctor a pathologist?
You "challenge" me to ask accident investigators what makes driving
dangerous, but you refuse to tell me if you follow the same logic in
your personal health.
-- 
Brandon

"Spooooooooooonnnnn!"