🚀 go-pugleaf

E. Faubion wrote:
> "Mark B." <spam_*this*_@see.my.sig> wrote:

> >Nice try, Mike.  Too bad it's wrong.  399.99% DEAD FUCKING WRONG!
 
> I think we get the picture now.   If Uselessnet can get to you this
> much just imagine what some poor slob on the highway could do.

Yes, Earl, I'm *sure* you can remotely determine my state-of-mind
from the language, punctuation and capitalization of a usenet post.

'Course, that's not nearly as amazing as your ability to determine
driver-competence by RADAR -- or to telepathically detect/correct
erroneous tape-measure readings from a brake-performance test you
didn't attend.

I'll bet you're also pretty good at spoon bending, psychic surgery,
Slick-50 testimonials, tele-evangelism, and multi-level-marketing.

With those astonishing talents, it's no surprise that you're the
most popular expert in town.  There's prolly not a single juror
in all of Oklahoma who'd believe the opinion of a dead foreigner
named Isaac when it contradicts the expert testimony of a local
good ol' boy named Earl.  (What kinda pinko name is "Isaac"!?)


> Can we spell R-O-A-D  R-A-G-E  ??

Nope, I'm not much into mythology or talk-radio psychology.  OTOH, I did
expect to see it on your list, Earl -- along with:  T-O-O-T-H 
F-A-I-R-Y,
E-A-S-T-E-R  B-U-N-N-Y,  and  F-O-R-E-N-S-I-C  S-C-I-E-N-C-E. 

...anything with "science" in its name, isn't,

Mark B.
-- 
   ------------------------------------------------------------------
  |  brindle   |  An empty head is not really empty;  it is stuffed  |
  |     @      |  with rubbish.  Hence the difficulty of forcing     |
  | chesco.com |  anything into an empty head.         -Eric Hoffer  |
   ------------------------------------------------------------------