🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: dc.general
Article #2038

Re: Bob Barr...Congressman from Ga. May be on Larry Flynts List.

#2038
From: Ron Conroy
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 00:00
52 lines
3428 bytes
Lloyd R. Parker wrote in message <768c0h$43d$1@curly.cc.emory.edu>...
>Ron Conroy (rcconroy@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>: Lloyd R. Parker wrote in message <763fk6$g5e$1@paladin.cc.emory.edu>...
>: >Streek53 (streek53@mindspring.com) wrote:
>: >: <<Clinton is a criminal, and more dangerous now than ever before.>>
>: >:
>: >: Yes, he's got nothing to lose. And everybody in the country knows he
had
>: a
>: >: sexual affair with Monica...though he still won't admit this under
oath.
>: >
>: >He has admitted he had sex with Monica.  Under oath, he denied he had
>: >"sexual relations" with her as the term was defined to him then (meaning
>: >intercourse, according to him).
>:
>:
>: He has NEVER admitted to having "sex with Monica."  He did admit to
having
>: an "inappropriate relationship" with her, but that's all.
>
>No, he has admitted tom having sex with her.  Oral sex, which by his
>interpretation of the definition of "sexual relations" given at the
>deposition, didn't fall under that definition.  And Lewinsky testified
>that she didn't believe oral sex constituted "sexual relations" either.


Wrong, he has NEVER admitted to having "sex with Monica."  Once again, he
did admit to having an "inappropriate relationship" with her.  As far as the
definitions are concerned, they are irrelevant.  In his grand jury
testimony, clarification of the definitions may have been established, but
he has never admitted to having "sex with Monica" forthright.  Furthermore,
some of the censure proposals coming from the Senate suggest that Clinton
would have to admit to his crimes of perjury and to his dishonesty about the
relationship with Monica.  In other words, he will probably be forced to
admit that he has "had sex with Monica" under oath in front of Congress.

>: Furthermore, it's a matter of law, not public opinion.  If you recall
>: correctly, Nixon had 65-75% approval ratings before the House Judiciary
>: Committee's vote.  Realizing that law would prevail, he resigned...
>
>Wrong!  Polls while the impeachment hearings were going on showed most
>people wanted Nixon out.


Wrong!  Nixon had strong support even on the day of his resignation.  Yes,
as the hearings progressed, Nixon lost a great deal of support, but even on
the days before his resignation, polls showed that only 40-45% of "the
people" wanted him to leave or be removed from office.  Those are the same
figures Clinton had the day after the House impeachment...

BTW, Nixon still had high job approval ratings...
Technical Details
Message-ID: <hqPh2.2399$jw2.4834436@news4.atl>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <75pnjd$m1e$3@winter.news.rcn.net> <f%Zf2.16404$K3.5142@news1.giganews.com> <75tioh$jhf$1@camel25.mindspring.com> <763fk6$g5e$1@paladin.cc.emory.edu> <2kdh2.1203$pD.1627213@news2.atl> <768c0h$43d$1@curly.cc.emory.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10e1e4,48bcccbaf3e8b9e7
X-Google-Attributes: gid10e1e4,public
X-Google-Thread: 1141a2,48bcccbaf3e8b9e7
X-Google-Attributes: gid1141a2,public
X-Google-Thread: 101049,48bcccbaf3e8b9e7
X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public
From: "Ron Conroy" <rcconroy@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Bob Barr...Congressman from Ga. May be on Larry Flynts List.
Date: 1998/12/28
Message-ID: <hqPh2.2399$jw2.4834436@news4.atl>
X-Deja-AN: 426495062
References: <75pnjd$m1e$3@winter.news.rcn.net> <f%Zf2.16404$K3.5142@news1.giganews.com> <75tioh$jhf$1@camel25.mindspring.com> <763fk6$g5e$1@paladin.cc.emory.edu> <2kdh2.1203$pD.1627213@news2.atl> <768c0h$43d$1@curly.cc.emory.edu>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 12:42:37 EST
Newsgroups: dc.general,atl.general,alt.politics