Article View: dc.general
Article #2151Re: [Fwd: Mexican Invasion]
From: Matthew Russotto
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 19:41
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 19:41
72 lines
4367 bytes
4367 bytes
In article <3d1227e7_1@newsa.ev1.net>, Marcus Taliaferro <mlt@ev1.net> wrote: > >> >> >Matthew Russotto wrote: >> >> No, actually. You're the largest. And perhaps the best educated; I >> haven't seen numbers for the succeeding generations. But you're not the >> most overlooked. Rather, you're the most pandered-to of any group with >> the possible exception of the generation before -- and only because >they've had >> longer to be pandered to. The most overlooked generations are those >> that were overshadowed by the Baby Boom. >> > >I'd like to know your reasoning and theories on your conclusion that we are >the most pandered to generation? You can't tell? The radio stations are still playing the music of your generation. The movies are derivatives of the movies of your generation. Most tax breaks are targeted towards your generation. New laws are written by and for people of your generation. >> Hmm. If your generation so wonderful, why isn't it people your age >> making the hiring decisions? > >I'd like to know the answer to that question myself. Could it be we are >descriminated against because you don't believe we "can cut it"? This just avoids the question; how could you be discriminated against by us if your generation is so great? If your generation is so great, why wouldn't people of your age be making hiring decisions? >> >We were taught to stick with it. None of this switch jobs every 3 years, >or >> >get caught up in a "RIF" because some top dog fucked up and has to reduce >> >his working force so he can keep his golden parachute and his top floor >> >corner office. >> >> Then you're a dumb fuck who hasn't learned to adapt. It isn't my >> generation which destroyed the idea of corporate loyalty; it's yours. >> It isn't my generation which makes up most of those fucked-up CEOs at >> the more-established companies; it's yours. > >How old do you think Jeff Skilling is? How old is David Duncan? Ken Lay is 59, Skilling is 48, both closer to your age than mine. Duncan looks younger, but he's not the fucked-up CEO; he's a flunky who helped in the coverup. >> >How old are you Mr. Russotto? Where will you be in 25 years? >> >> Dead or in jail, I would guess. Thanks to laws passed by people of your >> generation. > >Dead or in jail??? You aren't going to try and make this a better >place? Why don't you exercise your right to vote come November and make >some changes? Vote for whom? All of the choices (which will be largely drawn from your generation) will support those laws. >You dodged my last paragraph. Care to cover it now? Not really; it contained more nonsense than I care to deal with. -- Matthew T. Russotto mrussotto@speakeasy.net ===== Every time you buy a CD, a programmer is kicked in the teeth. Every time you buy or rent a DVD, a programmer is kicked where it counts. Every time they kick a programmer, 1000 users are kicked too, and harder. A proposed US law called the CBDTPA would ban the PC as we know it. This is not a joke, not an exaggeration. This is real. http://www.cryptome.org/broadbandits.htm
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<uh4bupfhfldt4e@corp.supernews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!russottoReferences:
<3D0E6C4F.CD6E7F08@earthops.net> <3d1202a7_2@newsa.ev1.net> <uh46t8rkdgsg32@corp.supernews.com> <3d1227e7_1@newsa.ev1.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109097,cf6083ad2b688a0a X-Google-Attributes: gid109097,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,cf6083ad2b688a0a X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-Thread: fc3d7,cf6083ad2b688a0a X-Google-Attributes: gidfc3d7,public X-Google-Thread: 107d03,cf6083ad2b688a0a X-Google-Attributes: gid107d03,public X-Google-Thread: 10b82c,cf6083ad2b688a0a X-Google-Attributes: gid10b82c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-20 12:41:14 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!russotto From: russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) Newsgroups: dc.general,austin.general,houston.general,la.general,alt.politics.immigration Subject: Re: [Fwd: Mexican Invasion] Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 19:41:13 -0000 Organization: Disorganized Message-ID: <uh4bupfhfldt4e@corp.supernews.com> References: <3D0E6C4F.CD6E7F08@earthops.net> <3d1202a7_2@newsa.ev1.net> <uh46t8rkdgsg32@corp.supernews.com> <3d1227e7_1@newsa.ev1.net> X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Lines: 72