🚀 go-pugleaf

"Tiny Human Ferret" <ixnayamspay_klaatu@earthops.net> wrote in message
news:3D10C122.57AB6A3@earthops.net...
> Matthew Russotto wrote:
> >
> > In article <3D0FC2DC.7BCA8A9B@earthops.net>,
> > Tiny Human Ferret  <ixnayamspay_klaatu@earthops.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >Justification. You also appear to have forgotten that the US not only
kicked
> > >the holy crap out of Mexico way back when, but also paid in GOLD -- at
fair
> > >market prices -- for the territories acquired. See also the Treaty of
> > >Guadalupe Hidalgo, which is violated with every single Mexican illegal
alien
> > >who crosses the border into the US with the tacit approval of Mexico.
> >
> > I doubt it, but even if it were so, so what?  The only penalty for
violating
> > a peace treaty is resumption of hostilities... which wouln't help you --
>
> Sure it would. It would put a rifle in my hand and not merely permission,
> but encouragement -- nay, actual orders -- to use it.
>
> > suppose the US goes down and kicks Mexico's butt (and would there be any
> > doubt?
>
> Yes. There are about 20 times as many Mexican nationals in the US as there
> are US citizens under arms in the military. Attempting to fight a war
> against an enemy which has already deployed into your heartland some 20
> times your available forces, generally it's not thought to be militarily
> sensible. And hence not done.
>
> > ).  Now what?  The US must either annex the territory (which makes
> > all those 'illegals' 100% legal, and as free to cross the state border
> > as anyone else) or run Mexico as an occupied territory (a really bad
> > idea).
>
> Resumption of hostilities need not be total, as I'm sure you're aware.
"Low
> intensity conflict" is the preferred mode for the US, and for most other,
> militaries. Simply sealing the border against unauthorized crossing should
> be sufficient, and is necessary. Since Mexico is not doing a sufficient
job
> of living up to their obligations to keep Mexicans in Mexico, we should
> simply help poor Mexico live up to her obligations, which would simply be
> the Us living up to its obligations under the treaty, which is to be a
'good
> neighbor'. And good fences make good neighbors, do they not?
>
> --
>     Be kind to your neighbors, even though they be transgenic chimerae.
> Whom thou'st vex'd waxeth wroth:  Meow. <----->
http://earthops.net/klaatu/
>

A special surtax on electricity, water, and other essentials applied to
persons using those Mexican ID cards given out by consulates would send out
a strong "signal" (to use the parlance of diplomats) to Mexico City that our
country can play games with Mexico City similar to their "human rights"
games whereby they send attorneys to Washington to defend one of their
illegal aliens over back-pay at a chicken processing plant.  (For the money
they pay the attorney representing the illegal alien -- they could build
their own chicken processing plant and employ their own nationals -- kind of
like the Japanese do in electronics or auto manufacturing -- but that's
beyond the thinking of Mexico's kleptocracy.)  Mexico gives our country two
choices -- either we become like Israel, South Africa (under white rule), or
the former Soviet Union and require everyone to carry papers or implanted
chips OR we become a de facto province of Mexico and Central America.

It is interesting to watch the EU and the politicians in Europe kind of ease
back from their "crack down" on illegal immigrants now that the recent
elections fade from memory and the World Cup occupies the minds of the
people -- but the rise of the right (i.e., nationalists who don't want
illegal immigrants diluting their Western culture) is going to be stronger
next round of elections, IMHO.