🚀 go-pugleaf

The Benghazi terrorist attack was a debacle in three distinct 
stages. The fatal mistakes occurred in the first two � the 
failure to provide adequate security before the attack and the 
failure to provide help once it started. Those mistakes were 
tragic, but the Obama administration�s explanations are 
coherent, though hardly defensible.

The mystery always has been the third stage � the aftermath, or 
more accurately, the coverup. Even before the bodies of the four 
Americans came home, the White House was eager to tell any story 
except the real one.

Aides twisted and turned to create the false narrative that a 
protest over an anti-Muslim video was spontaneously hijacked by 
radicals. But two problems quickly emerged: There was no video 
protest in Benghazi, and the attack, which used heavy weaponry, 
was well planned.

So, why did the White House spin the web of deceit? Don�t they 
know the coverup is worse than the crime?

Finally, we have the answer, thanks to Defense Secretary Leon 
Panetta. In his reluctant Senate testimony, he provided the 
missing piece of the puzzle: The commander in chief was MIA. The 
coverup was created to protect his absence.

According to Panetta, President Obama checked in with his 
military team early on during the attack, then checked out for 
the rest of the night. The next day, we already knew, he blamed 
the video maker and flew to Las Vegas for a campaign event.

Meanwhile, half a world away, Ambassador Chris Stevens and three 
other Americans had been slaughtered by Islamists. Their murders 
on the 11th anniversary of 9/11 gave the incident extra gravity 
and led the White House to conceal the facts. An honest 
chronology would have revealed the president�s shocking behavior 
during the most successful attack against Americans by 
foreigners since 9/11.

Imagine the questions that would have come: What did Obama do 
through the long, bloody night? Whom did he talk to? When did he 
learn that Stevens was dead?

http://nation.foxnews.com/benghazi/2013/02/11/nobody-wake-barack

--
Are you obligated as an armed civilian, to defend unarmed 
liberals while you are both under fire by foreign agents of the 
outlaw Obama administration?

No.  Shoot the liberals immediately so they can't stab you in 
the back while you are defending yourself, then return a 
controlled rate of aimed fire.  ��

��