🚀 go-pugleaf

In what is being called �the biggest hustle in human history,� a 
special  investigation has discovered numerous bogus claims on 
Barack Obama.  The claim turns out to be false.
As investigators delve further into the background of Barack 
Obama, a  disturbing picture is emerging of a man who is not who 
he claims to be.   The information the public has been told 
concerning Obama is turning out to be  false�fabrications and 
inventions of a man and an unseen force behind him that  had 
clear ulterior motives for seeking the highest office in the 
land.

According to a special report issued by �the Blogging 
Professor,� the Chicago Law School faculty  hated Obama.  The 
report states that Obama was unqualified, that he was  never a 
�constitutional professor and scholar,� and that he never served 
as  editor of the Harvard Law Review while a student at the 
school.

The real truth is that Barack Obama was merely an �instructor� 
at Chicago Law  School, not a professor.  Commonly, instructors 
are non-tenure-track  teachers hired by colleges and 
universities to teach certain courses for a  salary that is well 
below that of Associate Professors or full Professors.

In the hierarchy of higher education, the status of instructors 
is below that  of associate professors and professors because 
they lack the credentials.

In fact, it can be safely concluded that the claims of Barack 
Obama  concerning his educational credentials and work history 
in higher education are  a complete sham.  The President of the 
United States is a complete fraud.

According to Doug Ross:

I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at 
Chicago Law  a  few months back, and he did not have many nice 
things to say about  �Barry.�  Obama applied for a position as 
an adjunct and wasn�t even  considered.  A few  weeks later the 
law school got a phone call from the  Board of Trustees telling  
them to find him an office, put him on the  payroll, and give 
him a class to  teach.  The Board told him he didn�t  have to be 
a member of the faculty, but  they needed to give him a  
temporary position.  He was never a professor and was  hardly an 
adjunct.

The other professors hated him because he was lazy,  
unqualified, never  attended any of the faculty meetings, and it 
was  clear that the position was  nothing more than a political 
stepping  stool.  According to my professor  friend, he had the 
lowest intellectual  capacity in the building.  He also  doubted 
whether he was legitimately  an editor on the Harvard Law 
Review,  because if he was, he would be the  first and only 
editor of an Ivy League law  review to never be published  while 
in school (publication is or was a  requirement).

Thus,  the question arises, was the claim that Obama was editor 
of the  Harvard Law Review a �put-up job� as well, allowing the 
student to claim he held  this prestigious position without 
having the qualifications or meeting the  requirements of 
holding that position?  And why?

Further,

Consider this: 1.  President Barack Obama, former editor of the 
Harvard  Law  Review, is no longer a �lawyer�.   He surrendered 
his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that  he 
�fibbed� on his bar application.

2.  Michelle Obama  �voluntarily surrendered� her law license in 
1993.

3.  So, we  have the President and First Lady � who don�t 
actually have  licenses to  practice law. Facts.

4.  A senior lecturer is one thing.    A  fully ranked law 
professor is  another.  According to the Chicago  Sun-Times, 
�Obama did NOT �hold the title� of a University of Chicago  law  
school professor�.  Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law  
professor at  the University of Chicago.

5. The University of  Chicago released a statement in March, 
2008 saying Sen.  Barack Obama  (D-Ill.) �served as a professor� 
in the law school, but that is a  title  Obama, who taught 
courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for   the 
school confirmed in 2008.

These are highly disturbing facts, verified facts from the 
people who know at  the Chicago Law School.

There is more from Ross, however:

6.  �He did not hold the title of professor of law,� said Marsha 
 Ferziger  Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and 
Lecturer in  Law at the  University of Chicago School of Law.

7.      The  former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the 
U.S.  Constitution  recently during his State of the Union 
Address.  Unfortunately,  the  quote he cited was from the 
Declaration of Independence, not the   Constitution.

8.      The B-Cast  posted the video.

9.    In the State of the Union Address,  President Obama said: 
�We find  unity in our incredible diversity,  drawing on the 
promise enshrined in  ourConstitution: the notion that we  are 
all created equal.�

10.   By the way, the promises are not a  notion, our founders 
named them  unalienable rights.  The document is our  
Declaration of Independence and it  reads:  We hold these truths 
to be  self-evident, that all men are created  equal,that they 
are endowed by  their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,  
that among these are  Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

11. And this is the  same guy who lectured the Supreme Court 
moments later in  the same  speech?

When you are a phony it�s hard to keep facts straight.

Obama has made sure that all of his records are sealed tight.  
And apart  from the courageous souls at the various educational 
institutions who dared to  speak the truth, the schools Obama 
claimed to attend unanimously refuse to  release transcripts, 
records, or other bits of evidence concerning Obama�s  presence 
in their institutions.

BREAKING DEVELOPMENT�just as these disturbing  facts come to 
light about Barack Obama, the White House is busy making deals  
with numerous �journalists,� promising unprecedented access to 
the President in  exchange for refraining from reporting certain 
information �they may  discover.�

http://theobamahustle.wordpress.com/2012/04/11/investigation-
reveals-numerous-bogus-claims-on-obama-resume/

����