Article View: dc.general
Article #54464Re: Statehood
From: TheBigBopper
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 11:43
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 11:43
41 lines
3248 bytes
3248 bytes
In article <DZOEY.92Sep23204456@frob.eng.umd.edu> dzoey@frob.eng.umd.edu (Joseph Herman) writes: > >> 4/ The District isn't the first locality by a LONG shot which has elected >> a previously disgraced public official. Voters in another places have >> re-elected jailed officials, convicted sex offenders and KKK members. > >This is all true. I guess the question people seem to be dancing around is: > >What should the standards be for statehood? Should there be any? > >It seems to me that a colony should have a large number of people, a large >area of land, and be able to contribute something to the Union. > >The district fails on all three accounts. For a state, it has a small >population. It has almost no land after subtracting federal property. >I don't see what it would contribute to the welfare of the United >States if it gained statehood. Lawyers? Bureaucrats? Politicans? Well, yes. A home for lawyers, bureaucrats and politicians. Whats wrong with that? The District would be contiguous to the Federal G'ovt and would have a chance to restructure its tax base to attract businesses etc. that would enable it to remain self-supporting. Your criterion for Statehood is a little exclusive but the District is more populous than four states. Yesterday's post highlighted an area where the District's tax base is constantly under attack by the suburban jurisdictions. The Nat. Science Foundation has resisted moving to Arlington for years yet they were essentially ordered to do so by Congressmen Wolf and Moran. Congress voted down the funds yesterday to finance the move yet Moran was still insisting that the NSF would move. The city has very little to work with to resist this kind of erosion of its tax base. Another case in point was the Navy's desire to consolidate several departments at the Navy yard for apparently solid fiscal reasons. VA politicians, usually very attentive to budgetary abuse in the city, opposed this cost-saving move and killed it. Agencies in the city who want to move can always find a ready ear in Congress to sponsor it. The District has little leverage to oppose such moves. -- * Christ died for our sins. Dare we make his martyrdom meaningless by * * not committing any? So drink, fornicate, blaspheme, be a sodomite * * and die...the price has already been paid. * Warning: The Pope has determined the above sins are injurious to your health.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep25.114339.22523@umbc3.umbc.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!news.umbc.edu!umbc5.umbc.edu!williamfReferences:
<25110@oasys.dt.navy.mil> <1992Sep23.233830.16995@umbc3.umbc.edu> <DZOEY.92Sep23204456@frob.eng.umd.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101049,c0ea12765a50fbc5 X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-09-24 23:08:28 PST Newsgroups: dc.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!news.umbc.edu!umbc5.umbc.edu!williamf From: williamf@umbc5.umbc.edu (TheBigBopper) Subject: Re: Statehood Message-ID: <1992Sep25.114339.22523@umbc3.umbc.edu> Sender: newspost@umbc3.umbc.edu (News posting account) Organization: Univ. of MD, Baltimore County References: <25110@oasys.dt.navy.mil> <1992Sep23.233830.16995@umbc3.umbc.edu> <DZOEY.92Sep23204456@frob.eng.umd.edu> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 11:43:39 GMT Lines: 41