Article View: dc.general
Article #54467Re: A better view on Statehood.
From: Doug Humphrey
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 20:24
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 20:24
56 lines
3161 bytes
3161 bytes
> I know that this assertion draws lots of shrugs
> and eye-rolls but lets face it folks: this issue isn't about responsibility
> or even mainly about politics, this issue is about race.
How is this a racial issue? By racial I will assume that you
mean that the District is not going to get statehood because:
1) most of the people living there are black
or
2) the mayor is black
or
3) what?
I think that there are a lot of things that are going against
statehood for the district. Not all of them are things that
the District is in control of, but they are reality nonethless.
In no particular order:
1) The perception in congress that the district is not well
run, and that if the government is not doing a good job
in its current situation, with lots of oversight, then
they will do a worse with more independence. An example
might be the violent crime rate; it gives the District
a bad image on Capitol Hill (itself a violent area) and
those are the people who have the power to make statehood
a reality. Driving on the streets of the District might
also have some effect on opinions; street condition is poor.
2) There is a resistance to admit any more states, for fear
of the changes in the power balance in congress. The District
would be democratic for sure, so there will be some people who
will not want to see it happen.
3) Admission of DC might spark some other places to push
for statehood. Yes, these things are long shots, but
remember that politicians and the government prefer the
status quo.
DC could go a long way toward making statehood possible if it
was a really great example of how things should work, if the
crime rate was just average, if it stopped having embarassing
moments show up on national television (I was in California
when the Barry thing happened, and the coverage there was
pretty in depth). In short, if they are going to go ask
congress to make a decision in their favor, they will have to
earn it. Fair? Maybe not. Reality? Maybe so.
Doug
Disclaimer: not the views of Digital Express Group Inc., just mine.
--
Doug Humphrey doug@access.digex.com +1 301 220 2020
Digital Express Group, 6006 Greenbelt Road #228, Greenbelt, Maryland 20770 USA
Express Access Online Communications for Washington/Baltimore: info@digex.com
Login as "new": Washington 301-220-0462, Baltimore 410-766-1855
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep25.202431.9257@access.digex.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!digex.com!dougnewsReferences:
<1992Sep20.191908.15848@wam.umd.edu> <1992Sep21.143636.24307@hfsi.uucp> <1992Sep24.180936.15941@umbc3.umbc.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101049,c0ea12765a50fbc5 X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-09-25 08:36:32 PST Newsgroups: dc.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!digex.com!dougnews From: dougnews@access.digex.com (Doug Humphrey) Subject: Re: A better view on Statehood. Message-ID: <1992Sep25.202431.9257@access.digex.com> Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, Maryland USA References: <1992Sep20.191908.15848@wam.umd.edu> <1992Sep21.143636.24307@hfsi.uucp> <1992Sep24.180936.15941@umbc3.umbc.edu> Distribution: usa Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 20:24:31 GMT Lines: 56