Article View: dc.general
Article #54485Re: Statehood
From: Glenn Host
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1992 02:18
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1992 02:18
51 lines
2635 bytes
2635 bytes
mulvihil@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Lawrence Mulvihill) writes: >Considering the way the House and Senate continue to >alter the laws and budgets of D.C., and considering >that we have a heritage >of "no taxation without representation". Also given >that statehood has little chance of passage. May I >humbly suggest that since the congress "represents" >the people of DC, that DC residents be allowed to vote >in EVERY congressional district. >Just a modest proposal ;-). And a very poor joke. Just like Statehood for the District. The district was formed with the explict idea of a neutral site for our government. That is why the District area was taken from Virginia and Maryland originally. Arlington/Alexandria was given back when it became heavily residential and did not become a state; Neither should the District. If the residents in the district wish to have voting privilages they have three choices: 1. Move out of the District (a good idea for other reasons) 2. Declare residency in an another distict and take it to court 3. Petition for part of DC to return to Maryland. The choice is theirs The best idea I have heard is a law to prevent someone from moving to the District permanently; i.e. anyone living in the District would be able to continue living there (grandfathered in) but residences would all be considered 'temporary'. The District would become a home for temporary workers (government appointees, legislators, embassy officals, students, lobbyists, military personel etc) who would continue to maintain their state of residence in the original state. The same policy is used regarding miltary personel when stationed in other states - they can maintain their permanent residence in their orignal state (including not paying personal property taxes which is very common oin Virgina). Statehood for the District, another stupid idea which has not died yet. Statehood is not a viable option for the District -- Very grateful guest of Openage - the best SCO service shop in the area ************* my views represent no one - not even myself. ****************
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep17.021853.26698@openage.openage.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!metter!openage!ghostReferences:
<25101@oasys.dt.navy.mil>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101049,c0ea12765a50fbc5 X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-09-16 15:18:00 PST Newsgroups: dc.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!metter!openage!ghost From: ghost@openage.openage.com (Glenn Host) Subject: Re: Statehood Organization: Open Age, Inc. Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1992 02:18:53 GMT Message-ID: <1992Sep17.021853.26698@openage.openage.com> References: <25101@oasys.dt.navy.mil> Lines: 51