Article View: dc.general
Article #54588Re: Speeding & radar gun locking
From: Scott Bodarky
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1992 14:44
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1992 14:44
38 lines
2846 bytes
2846 bytes
karl@thuja.gsfc.nasa.gov (Karl A. Anderson) writes: > The last time this issue came up in this group, I asked the proponents > of higher speed limits for references to support their claims that, > for example, cars are more fuel efficient at 65 mph than at 55 mph, or > that highway accident rates are not a function of speed. By references, > I mean results of well-designed, controlled studies reported in reputable > publications (I'd even accept _Time_ magazine). Correct me if I am mistaken, but you are the guy who applauded speed limits while admitting that you had received speeding tickets for exceeding it yourself, yes? Why should anyone be obligated to respond to you? Because you have issued a decree that only certain evidence is admissible? I haven't seen any hard facts from your side of the debate either (although which side you're on isn't clear, as you seem to be burning your candle from both ends). I keep a log; every time I get gas I record my car's mileage, the amount of gas, where I got it, octane, and other data. My logs record every smidgeon of a gallon of gas I've ever put in my car. Based on the routes I travel, I can determine what speeds favor better gas mileage for my car. I suspect that many of the folks claiming that their cars get better gas mileage at 65 say so because they pay attention. Each car is different, of course, and speeds of maximal gas efficiency are more a result of design than happenstance. It would be most interesting to see where people fall on this issue based on whether they drive with a manual transmission or an automatic transmission (which is really more like driving a boat than a car). I always signal and drive as consistently as possible; maybe that's why I've never gotten a moving violation (I was found "not guilty" on the one ticket I have ever received). -Scott (bodarky@cme.nist.gov)| "The American public knows what it wants, | and deserves to get it good and hard." The National Institute | of Standards & Technology | -H. L. Mencken
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BODARKY.92Jul16104423@twiz.cme.nist.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dove!cme!durer!bodarkyReferences:
<1992Jul9.204254.1999@access.digex.com> <NIGEL.92Jul14115849@rs733.GSFC.NASA.Gov> <1992Jul15.215148.2647@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101049,42413b28c2f5309e X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-07-16 02:05:52 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dove!cme!durer!bodarky From: bodarky@cme.nist.gov (Scott Bodarky) Newsgroups: dc.general Subject: Re: Speeding & radar gun locking Message-ID: <BODARKY.92Jul16104423@twiz.cme.nist.gov> Date: 16 Jul 92 14:44:23 GMT References: <1992Jul9.204254.1999@access.digex.com> <NIGEL.92Jul14115849@rs733.GSFC.NASA.Gov> <1992Jul15.215148.2647@nsisrv.gsfc.nasa.gov> Sender: news@cme.nist.gov Organization: National Institute of Standards and Technology Lines: 38 Nntp-Posting-Host: twiz In-reply-to: karl@thuja.gsfc.nasa.gov's message of 15 Jul 92 21:51:48 GMT