Re: GEICO's opposition to 65 mph (was Re: recommendations for auto/hom

Article View: dc.general

Article #55176

#55176

From: Guy Hadsall
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1992 15:54

3 lines
766 bytes


Agreed Dave.  Enough on this issue....NEXT !

Technical Details

Message-ID: <92086.105412GHADSAL@auvm.american.edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!ghadsal

References:

<16753@oasys.dt.navy.mil>> <MITCH.92Mar20170002@spica.clsi> <5188@npri6.npri.com> <1992Mar26.024822.2509@eng.umd.edu> <50586@seismo.CSS.GOV>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 101049,769f95e5eb227b3b
X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-03-26 07:54:12 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!ghadsal
Organization: The American University - University Computing Center
Date: Thursday, 26 Mar 1992 10:54:12 EST
From: Guy Hadsall <GHADSAL@auvm.american.edu>
Message-ID: <92086.105412GHADSAL@auvm.american.edu>
Newsgroups: dc.general
Subject: Re: GEICO's opposition to 65 mph (was Re: recommendations for auto/hom
Distribution: dc
References: <16753@oasys.dt.navy.mil>> <MITCH.92Mar20170002@spica.clsi>
 <5188@npri6.npri.com> <1992Mar26.024822.2509@eng.umd.edu>
 <50586@seismo.CSS.GOV>

Reply to Parent Message