Article View: dc.general
Article #55277Re: Maryland's Interstate Speeds
From: Raul Deluth Miller-Rockwell
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1992 00:18
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1992 00:18
41 lines
2893 bytes
2893 bytes
Dan Nagle: OK. Let's properly apply the laws of physics. Power consumed by pushing the car thru the air scales as the cube of the speed. CO will scale the same way (you guys aren't claiming cars produce less pollution *per gallon* at higher speeds, are you?). So pollution *per mile of highway* goes up as the square of traffic speed... Not exactly. Pollution from engine power required to overcome air resistance varies (approximately) this way. But you're silly if you think that's all that a car does. In addition to friction losses from a variety of sources, there's accelleration losses, hill climbing loses, idling losses, and others... One of the most important contribution speed/safety has for pollution is its contribution to traffic jams. Laws which encourage unsafe driving [which includes laws which require people to drive below the optimum speed for road and weather] will tend to result in more traffic jams and, thus, more pollution. I frequently drive 65 to 70 mph on local highways. I'm willing to admit it's a luxury bought with (slightly) higher gas bills, (slightly) more pollution, and a (slight) decrease in safety. You think it's safe to have a relative velocity of -10 miles per hour with respect of the rest of traffic? Why? Under what kind of traffic conditions would you think this is safe and efficient? Actually, that question is not completely fair. On a multi-lane road, it's safest if each lane is going somewhat faster than its neighbors [going from right to left]. This reduces clumping of cars, and helps people know what's going on in their blind spots. A little clumping might be ok, as that helps reduce monotony, but it can get rather nasty [as in: traffic jam]. Anyways, the biggest contribution to safety is a good driver. Driver training can contribute much more to safety than speed laws which are so bad they can not be safely followed. -- Raul Deluth Miller-Rockwell <rockwell@socrates.umd.edu> The U.S. government went another thousand million dollars into debt today.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ROCKWELL.92Apr5191852@socrates.umd.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!socrates!socrates!rockwellReferences:
<17190@oasys.dt.navy.mil> <1992Mar30.234548.8807@eng.umd.edu> <1992Mar31.150034.3866@seas.gwu.edu> <1857@ra.nrl.navy.mil>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101049,36b3c943cd31e19e X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-04-05 17:18:52 PST Newsgroups: dc.general Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!socrates!socrates!rockwell From: rockwell@socrates.umd.edu (Raul Deluth Miller-Rockwell) Subject: Re: Maryland's Interstate Speeds In-Reply-To: dan@rcdips.nrl.navy.mil's message of 1 Apr 92 15:03:54 GMT Message-ID: <ROCKWELL.92Apr5191852@socrates.umd.edu> Sender: rockwell@socrates.umd.edu (Raul Deluth Miller-Rockwell) Organization: Traveller References: <17190@oasys.dt.navy.mil> <1992Mar30.234548.8807@eng.umd.edu> <1992Mar31.150034.3866@seas.gwu.edu> <1857@ra.nrl.navy.mil> Distribution: dc Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 00:18:52 GMT