Article View: dc.general
Article #55316Re: GEICO's opposition to 65 mph (was Re: recommendations for auto/home insurance?)
From: David Mackintosh
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1992 14:30
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1992 14:30
19 lines
1498 bytes
1498 bytes
In dc.general, karl@thuja.gsfc.nasa.gov (Karl A. Anderson) writes: > >They're welcome to spend _my_ money on that. Keeping the limit at 55 >mph saves gas, keeps pollution (including greenhouse gases) lower, and >saves my money by keeping accident rates lower, thereby keeping >insurance claims and thus premiums lower. Oh, yeah - it save lives, >too. Spoken like a true Ralph Nader wannabee safety Nazi. My guess is that you either drive an American (but made in Japan) econobox with 155 tires and automatic transmission that couldn't stop from any speed above 35 (so you insist on an airbag), or a rolling sofa like a Buick Roadmaster wagon (but not above 55 to save gas). Believe me, 55 won't keep rates lower, but millions spent on lobbying against what *the people* want sure won't help. David Mackintosh
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<16753@oasys.dt.navy.mil>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!oasys!mackintoReferences:
<51290@mimsy.umd.edu> <1992Mar18.131757@thuja.gsfc.nasa.gov>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 101049,769f95e5eb227b3b X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1992-03-19 06:38:00 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!dtix!oasys!mackinto From: mackinto@oasys.dt.navy.mil (David Mackintosh) Newsgroups: dc.general Subject: Re: GEICO's opposition to 65 mph (was Re: recommendations for auto/home insurance?) Message-ID: <16753@oasys.dt.navy.mil> Date: 19 Mar 92 14:30:57 GMT References: <51290@mimsy.umd.edu> <1992Mar18.131757@thuja.gsfc.nasa.gov> Reply-To: mackinto@oasys.dt.navy.mil (David Mackintosh) Distribution: dc Organization: Carderock Division, NSWC, Bethesda, MD Lines: 19