Article View: dc.general
Article #6289Re: Tyson vs. Coleman
From: GHalleck
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 00:00
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 00:00
70 lines
3395 bytes
3395 bytes
mikejm�@westworld.com wrote in message <36c6f81e.68030544@news.wgn.net>... >On Tue, 09 Feb 1999 23:36:56 GMT, "GHalleck" ><ghalleck@launchnet.com>'s laid this one on us: > >> >>mikejm�@westworld.com wrote in message <36c38d69.6353614@news.wgn.net>... >> >>>OK Halleck. >>> >>>I choose you. I'll meet you for a fight. >>> >>>Leave your plunger at home. >> >> >>Fair enough. Find me in a bar and take a swing. I guess I'd have no >>choice. >> >>I see my point is (predictablly) lost on you. Incidently, do you routinely >>settle problems and disagreements with violence or just talk a lot of trash? >> > >If somebody pushes me around, I push back. Sometimes I get hurt, >sometimes my opponent gets hurt. Always somebody gets hurt because >once I've been pushed I don't back down. > > Great. What about those Pasadena cops you fumed for months over? Challenged any of them yet? Yawn... Basic fact: You rant but DO nothing. > >>> >>> >>>>Interesting. I encountered about a dozen spontaneously rude people that >>>>"crowded" me every day on patrol. Do I get to punch them? I used eat >>quite >>>>a bit of conduct that is very border-line...some of it perhaps criminal, >>>>that I allowed for the greater good. Should I just start belting these >>>>folks because they are "out of hand?" >>> >>> >>>I'm not saying that every act of rudeness warrants an ass kicking. But >>>this bitch was looking for trouble. Mr Coleman wasn't cruizing around >>>looking for fat ugly MTA drivers to beat up, she found him. >> >> >> >>So do I get to kick ass at calls for service? Like when I'm interviewing >>one party and another comes up "looking for trouble?" Deep down, I suspect >>that you KNOW battery is wrong. >> > >What do mean "battery"? who commited battery on who? She crowded him, >obstructed his way - got in his face - > Shhhhhhhh. Look up "battery" in a dictionary or Penal code. Play any semantic game of your choice but two facts remain: (1) Coleman settled an anger problem with violence and (2) You condoned it. Don't back away from it....just explain why cops can't do the same thing. GHalleck
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<oE9w2.43036$un6.12941820@news.inreach.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<36BBF6CF.5DF9@ix.netcom.com> <Ns3v2.113$_v2.391@news15.ispnews.com> <199902062250.XAA04172@replay.com> <36bde092.102075036@news.wgn.net> <%fjv2.41993$un6.11151124@news.inreach.com> <36bee50d.56594665@news.wgn.net> <9LGv2.42516$un6.11906572@news.inreach.com> <36c38d69.6353614@news.wgn.net> <sE3w2.42981$un6.12757848@news.inreach.com> <36c6f81e.68030544@news.wgn.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 106ed4,50ce4663e86ece49 X-Google-Attributes: gid106ed4,public X-Google-Thread: 1038e3,50ce4663e86ece49 X-Google-Attributes: gid1038e3,public X-Google-Thread: 108b95,50ce4663e86ece49 X-Google-Attributes: gid108b95,public X-Google-Thread: f4d80,50ce4663e86ece49 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4d80,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,50ce4663e86ece49 X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public From: "GHalleck" <GHalleck1@inreach.com> Subject: Re: Tyson vs. Coleman Date: 1999/02/10 Message-ID: <oE9w2.43036$un6.12941820@news.inreach.com> X-Deja-AN: 442701559 References: <36BBF6CF.5DF9@ix.netcom.com> <Ns3v2.113$_v2.391@news15.ispnews.com> <199902062250.XAA04172@replay.com> <36bde092.102075036@news.wgn.net> <%fjv2.41993$un6.11151124@news.inreach.com> <36bee50d.56594665@news.wgn.net> <9LGv2.42516$un6.11906572@news.inreach.com> <36c38d69.6353614@news.wgn.net> <sE3w2.42981$un6.12757848@news.inreach.com> <36c6f81e.68030544@news.wgn.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 Organization: InReach Internet NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 22:26:28 PDT Newsgroups: dc.general,md.general,ca.general,misc.legal,alt.law-enforcement