🚀 go-pugleaf

One thing is obvious: government does not want to go into any details
as to how he died.  Why?  The guy is a hero, his death must have been
heroic, why not to publicize it?  During the war with Germany, many
Soviet soldiers placed grenades around their bodies and then thrown
themselves under German tanks; others had thrown their bodies on the
openings in German fortifications, from where machine-guns were
firing, thus shielding other soldiers and allowing them to conquer
German Positions.  All this was publicized, of course.

Why not to publicize the heroic death of the CIA agent?  We saw
recently on virtually all channels in US and Canada the process of
interrogation of American Taliban guy Walker by this CIA agent.  We
see about 50 prisoners tied up in a pretty tortuous manner.  They are
taken one by one for interrogation.  We see Walker being taken, his
face is not blacken yet, and he is walking on his own.  Walker refuses
to speak to CIA agent and returned back, still tied up.  Then we are
told, that several hours later, an uprising started and CIA agent was
killed.  No details.  None of the reporters asked Walker what
happened, how did his face become black, why he can not walk, what
happened to him, etc.  Yellow media is yellow media.

Here are some thoughts about what I saw.  First, each tape like this
always has a timer running - no timer on this tape.  Someone erased
it.  Why?  Second, we hear CIA agent telling Walker point blank, that
he would be killed, unless he talks.  Excuse me, what happened to
Geneva Convention?  Third, all this stuff was taped in little detail,
probably by several cameras (We see Walker taken at one place, then we
see him interrogated, then his face in zoom, etc.), clearly, the
uprising itself was filmed, at least the beginning of it.  Why don't
they show it to us?  All we saw of that "uprising", was an Alliance
soldier coming to a wall and shooting down, without looking where he
was shooting, that's it. It looked like a spectacle for the media,
because there was no evidence that someone was shooting at him.

Fourth, if you tell every prisoner, that he would be killed, don't you
think that you are inviting a revolt?  These people have surrendered,
because they were promised life.  Fifth, many killed prisoners were
found with their hands still tied, how could you revolt with hands
tied up?  I saw a number of bodies, and I did not see any weapon near
them.  There were reports, that prisoners managed to "smuggle" weapons
into jail.  Do you believe this nonsense?  Weapon is not something you
can put in your mouth.  I also saw these prisoners being searched upon
surrender.

I think, government has a very good reason not to tell us, how exactly
CIA agent died.  I suggest compiling a "Top Ten" list of reasons why
CIA and government do not want us to know the details of CIA agent's
death. Here is my contribution: he was caught sodomizing a prisoner,
which for any Muslim is a deadly sin, and killed by a Northern
Alliance soldier. Any other suggestions?

	Fabrikant

P. S. If you wish to know what really happened at Concordia and how
the media lied about it, send an E-mail to hollyric@colba.net, and you
will be given the file.  If you have doubts about the authenticity of
any posting, send your inquiry to the same address, and you will get a
confirmation or a denial.