🚀 go-pugleaf

pat wrote:
> 
> Keith A. Glass wrote:
> 
> > Promulgated for discussion: your comments are welcome.  I used AndyI.2
> > What kinds of posts are acceptable to 'dc.general.moderated'?
> >
> >      'dc.general.moderated' is a robomoderated discussion group:
> >      that is to say, we have software enforcing a few basic
> >      rules for posts.  As of the date of this FAQ, the rules
> >      are as follows:
> >
> >       Any acceptable message must have:
> >       - No more than 4 newsgroups total
> >        (should weed out a lot of spam)
> >       - No *.general other than dc, va, md, balt, md.pg, md.mont,
> >         or wv (amendable if other local hierarchies appear)
> >       - Posted to no other dc.* groups other than dc.general
> >         (if it's not of general interest, why post it here ??)
> >
> 
> Because sometimes issues aren't that clear.  I think a rule would be no more
> then onex-post from thedc.* hierarchy.  Let's look at the issue.
> 
> Travey Levin is creating dc.g.mod,  the basic rules will kick out tracy, we
> havent' had
> much issue in bleed through from dc.driving or dc.dining.

Travid was the impetus, but the bleedthrough of the Gary Burnore wars
also
added to it. . .this morning, I had 70+ messages in dc.general, perhaps
10 were dc-related. . .