Article View: dc.general
Article #6592Re: was: New Charter for dc.general
From: Rex
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 1996 00:00
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 1996 00:00
61 lines
3087 bytes
3087 bytes
Austin Kelly wrote: > > In article <3221A559.65FC@access.digex.net>, Rex <rex@access.digex.net> wrote: > >I sincerely hope that whoever writes the dc.general charter *at least* > >lives in DC. > > Is Forest Hills good enough for you, or does it have to be Adams-Morgan > to be *really* DC? What does this mean, Austin? If you can show me where I claimed that they only *real* part of DC was Adams-Morgan, I will gladly defer to your misguided attempt at sarcasm. Anybody who lives within the District lines would qualify as a person who lives in DC. I don't care if they live in Barry Farms. > > > >The *.dc Newsgroups (and city as a whole), have been suburban-centric > >for far too long. City residents deserve their own forum for discussion > >with other city residents. > > > Every other regional group that I know is regional, covering the > entire metro area. What about proposing a dc.city newsgroup if > you want something limited to the city. But you still can't > keep suburban residents out. Virginia and Maryland already have newsgroups. Also, the other city newsgroups are usually part of a state in which everyone supports, including, often, its suburban counterparts. And, I am fully aware that suburbanites "can't be kept out". I was hoping that whoever wrote the charater lived.in.dc. > >Perhaps dc.md-va.general or something similar for those who feel that > >they MUST identify with DC, when they don't live here (I still like > >dc.wannabe). > > > >Anyway, here's hoping that the rules for DC aren't once again made by > >those who don't live here. > > > >Yeah, who am I kidding? > > I don't know. Who are you kidding? I guess just myself. And anyone else who believes anything related to DC will be controlled by those who actually live in DC, as opposed to those who live in the often postured "DC Metro Area". A lot of people realize that DC, and the DC metro area, are vastly different entities, with different demographics, problems, and interests. > Shouldn't this all be kept in the initial thread, anyway? Both of my news servers suck. What can I say? Sometimes I have to read on one, and post on the other because of "no=permission" errors, "no space left to write" errors, and general timouts. When possible, I try to maintain the original thread, and I think that in the vast majority of cases, I have.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3221AC35.719D@access.digex.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3221A559.65FC@access.digex.net> <4vs9bm$oei@access1.digex.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f47cb,158f1a61e160bc5e X-Google-Attributes: gidf47cb,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,158f1a61e160bc5e X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public From: Rex <rex@access.digex.net> Subject: Re: was: New Charter for dc.general Date: 1996/08/26 Message-ID: <3221AC35.719D@access.digex.net> X-Deja-AN: 176542392 references: <3221A559.65FC@access.digex.net> <4vs9bm$oei@access1.digex.net> content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii organization: Express Access Online Communications, USA mime-version: 1.0 reply-to: rex@access.digex.net newsgroups: dc.general,dc.config x-mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win95; I)