🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: dc.org.linux-users
Article #3797

Re: Considering Linux

#3797
From: Michael Shields
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 1995 00:00
17 lines
1342 bytes
In article <40jssh$dpi@canton.charm.net>,
Philip G. DeMario <pdemario@charm.net> wrote:
> I recently browsed a book that came with a CD ROM of Slackware Linux - it 
> claimed I didn't have to partition my hard drive to install the 
> particular flavor of Linux.  Could this be true?  If so what are the 
> disadvantages of not partitioning?

I assume they mean "repartition".   Yes, it is true, with a filesystem
called umsdos, that gives Unix-like features in an MS-DOA compatible
filesystem.  The advantage is that you can try Linux without doing
anything drastic.  The disadvantage is that it's slow and not as robust as
the ext2 native filesystem.  A better option, if you're sure you want to
use Linux (excellent choice!), is to set up a new partition or three for
Linux and use LILO, the supplied boot manager, to dual-boot DOS and Linux.
The installation manual should cover this.
-- 
Shields.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <40lgs7$f1m@yage.tembel.org>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <40jssh$dpi@canton.charm.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11663c,46d4a3e0a396253b
X-Google-Attributes: gid11663c,public
From: shields@tembel.org (Michael Shields)
Subject: Re: Considering Linux
Date: 1995/08/13
Message-ID: <40lgs7$f1m@yage.tembel.org>
X-Deja-AN: 108096578
references: <40jssh$dpi@canton.charm.net>
organization: Tembel's Hedonic Commune
nntp-posting-user: shields
newsgroups: dc.org.linux-users