Article View: dc.org.linux-users
Article #3927Re: Linux Internet Providers
From: Stephen Balbach
Date: Fri, 19 May 1995 00:00
Date: Fri, 19 May 1995 00:00
54 lines
3082 bytes
3082 bytes
In article <3pfouo$89f@skipper.surenet.net>, Nathan Stratton <nathan@novanet.com> wrote: >Scott Huddle (huddle@mci.net) wrote: >: >We are a NSP, and we use linux on all of our servers. We also provide >: >access to other ISP's in the area, and we try to get them to also use >: >Linux. If you want more info on NovaNet, send email to me or >: >sales@novanet.com. I would think security would be an issue with Linux - that is the one drawback i have seen is as it is in continual development new security holes seem to pop up - or even created by the developers intentionally for whatever reason there is no controll over accountability. >: I could be wrong, but I thought NSP was a term applied by the National >: Science Foundation for ISPs that provided inter-regional connectivity >: and connection to multiple NAPs. I think that is the NSF - the NSF contracts out to MCI to provide a high-speed r&d network called the vBNS - the vBNS is not directly part of the Internet although it does have gateways to the Internet at NAP (Network Access Points). vBNS is designed primarily to connect super computers. The old NSF backbone was run by Merit (in MI) and is no longer in service effective this month. It is replaced by NAP's where commercial ISP/NSP's interconnect at peering points. >: All NSPs are ISPs, but only a few (3) are NSPs. Is that right? ISP and NSP are just nameing conventions they mean the same thing. The only real distinction is if you are a peer level ISP - a peer level ISP peers with other ISP's at the NAP's - eg. they dont pay each other for tranist but rather mutually agree to exchange traffic and no one uses default routes they only point traffic to another peer if its destined to got here. Peering usually requires access to multiple NAPs and a national backbone (eg an existing national WAN). >Well ther are many more then 3. We are multihomed, are peering with >several regionals, have a 10 meg connection into MAE-East (well, in about >10 days), and provide access to several other ISP's. I would say net99 is >a NSP just as we are, you not not need to connect with ALL the naps. You can connect to any NAP's you want the question is will other ISP/NSP's allow you to peer with them. Most national providers have criteria before they agree to become peers with you, some more difficult then others. /stb -- --- Stephen Balbach "Driving the Internet to Work" VP, ClarkNet info@clark.net
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3pioet$8g2@clark.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<3p8fnc$75r@skipper.surenet.net> <3pdmh7$4sb@news.internetmci.com> <3pfouo$89f@skipper.surenet.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11663c,f1ac6d30b6ec5eaf X-Google-Attributes: gid11663c,public From: stephen@clark.net (Stephen Balbach) Subject: Re: Linux Internet Providers Date: 1995/05/19 Message-ID: <3pioet$8g2@clark.net> X-Deja-AN: 102990048 references: <3p8fnc$75r@skipper.surenet.net> <3pdmh7$4sb@news.internetmci.com> <3pfouo$89f@skipper.surenet.net> content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 organization: Clark Internet Services, Balt/DC, mail all-info@clark.net mime-version: 1.0 newsgroups: dc.org.linux-users