🚀 go-pugleaf

"Intrepid" <Intrepid517@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:e1e8a753-a91c-45d3-a0d1-0b45c15a683b@f29g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> <
> http://www.edconrad.com/pics/SaveTheWhale.jpg
> <
> See, I even have a photo to prove it.
> <
> This video is David Attenborugh's most recent bullshit.
> <
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/video/2009/may/19/ida-fossil-attenborough-missing-link
> <
> What crap! What cow manure? How do these evolutionist assholes keep
> getting away with it?
> <
> HOW CAN ATTENBOROUGH AND OTHERS CLAIM IDA IS A MISSING LINK SINCE ONE
> NEVER EXISTED  IN THE FIRST PLACE.
> <
> Man, you see, did not evolve from ANY lower animal.
> <
> This is proven, beyond all doubt, by the discovery
> of  HUMAN  REMAINS -- two skulls, fingers, a femur, a tibia,
> mandibles, even a hand-carved tool, among others -- all petrified and
> discovered between seams of anthracite coal in Pennsylvania.

--------------------
can you cite someone other than edconrad's claims?
Note that , if true, there would be considerable interest in this from other 
sources.
you will also  have to throw out Bishop Unger's time table of 4004 BC, based 
on the Bible, as to the time of creation which is biblically based.
Try reading the inherent truths of the Bible, as was done until the 1600's 
or later, as a "mythos" rather than as a literal, word for word, truth. In 
fact, scripture does not deal with "science" (as it presents earth centered 
"science" which is long refuted ) - a matter which theologians fully 
recognize. Might I recommend Karen Armstrong's "The Case for God" (which 
whacks "fundamentalists" as hard as "atheists"),  and Hans Kung's "The 
Beginning of All Things, Science and Religion".

Science (including evolutionary science) deals with "how" as opposed to 
"why" and there is really no conflict. Again, theologists recognize 
this -and have, from the time of Augustine (roughly 1500 years ago).
 It appears that  the universities that you have "black" listed also know 
this.  Get with it.

Attenborough is not the one blowing gas.

- -- 
-----
Don Kelly
cross out to reply