🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 14:27:42 -0700, Bob Casanova wrote:

> On 24 Jan 2009 16:20:12 GMT, the following appeared in sci.skeptic,
> posted by Mark K Bilbo <gmail@com.mkbilbo>:
> 
>>On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:19:22 -0700, Bob Casanova wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 Jan 2009 20:03:04 GMT, the following appeared in sci.skeptic,
>>> posted by Mark K Bilbo <gmail@com.mkbilbo>:
>>> 
>>>>On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:38:42 -0500, copernicus123 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> ED CONRAD'S pRIZE-WINNING FART
>>>>
>>>>Proving his brain is petrified coal with every post...
>>> 
>>> Doubtful; coal is useful.
>>
>>Except petrificationism reductifies the usefulbilities.
> 
> Yeah, that would follow; most rocks don't burn very well... ;-)
> 
>>(Hey, if he can make up psuedo-science shit...)
> 
> Can, does, and always has. Except I'd hardly class it as even
> *pseudo*-science; more like free-association while on drugs.

And it sounds like *so* much fun! Let's all do it!

-- 
Mark K. Bilbo                a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"You believe in a book that has talking animals, wizards, 
witches, demons, sticks turning into snakes, food falling 
from the sky, people walking on water, and all sorts of magical, 
absurd and primitive stories, and you say that *we* are the 
ones that need help?" - Jon Stoll