Does this micrograph show blood vessel remains or minerals only?

Article View: dc.smithsonian

Article #279

#279

From: Lin Liangtai
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 07:11

6 lines
1587 bytes

A famous journal asked a "peer" to review my article. The reviewer
claimed all the micrographs in my article showed nothing but
minerals.
The following is an example of my micrographs.
Do you think it shows minerals or bloold vessel remains?
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=13&f=1588634781&p=63

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1193987517.042857.91140@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: fcca9,f79328c86e7aa11f,start
X-Google-Thread: 10ddf4,f79328c86e7aa11f,start
X-Google-Thread: 10d8cb,f79328c86e7aa11f,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfcca9,gid10ddf4,gid10d8cb,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From:  Lin Liangtai <lin440315@yahoo.com.tw>
Newsgroups: dc.smithsonian,alt.catastrophism,sci.archaeology.mesoamerican
Subject: Does this micrograph show blood vessel remains or minerals only?
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:11:57 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <1193987517.042857.91140@z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.8.76.154
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1193987544 11817 127.0.0.1 (2 Nov 2007 07:12:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 07:12:24 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z24g2000prh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=124.8.76.154;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0