🚀 go-pugleaf

In dc.smithsonian, flanigan@echo.gsfc.nasa.gov (Dennis Flanigan) writes:
>In article <1i9nlmINN9d4@venus.cs.umbc.edu>, piatko@cs.umbc.edu (Christine Piat
>ko) writes:
>
>I hate to say this ,but I think the Star Trek exhibit is long gone.  This
>is all from memory, but it was never meant to be a long term exhibit and
>I think it ended in the Fall sometime.  I saw in the Post a couple of
>weeks ago that a new exhibit about the future of manned exploration
>opened at the A+S.   I assume that this replaced the Star Trek exhibit.

well, the star trek exhibit was still there as of last friday.
i remember reading in the paper (post) that the exhibit was extending
its stay at the NASM.

good luck,

lito lucena
lito@oasys.dt.navy.mil
 now at  :  dtmb, cdhq, nwsc          'if the defaults weren't good enough,
 formerly: dtrc, carderock                  they wouldn't be defaults.....'
							bill's sister