🚀 go-pugleaf

USA_First wrote:

> In article <374E1DB5.A81FFD61@bga.com>,
>   Jim Herring <mustang@bga.com> wrote:
>
> > 3. Believe it or not a 12 year old bugler is more likely to be
> carrying a
> > gun than a experienced 25 year old bugler. Most experienced buglers
> know
> > better (it really ups the jail time). And, the kids think it's macho.
> >
>
> Please list your source (statistic, credible cop websight, university
> study) for this fallacy.  Are we to believe your expert commentary on a
> subject that you can not even spell correctly?

Read virtually any study on home invaders in prison. And, the damn spell
checker fucked up. Shish, spelling doesn't count for squat in a newsgroup.

> > 5. How moral is it to let a thief escape and steal from someone else?
> Sure
> > you will feel bad if you shot the kid. But, he is the one who put
> himself
> > in that position.
>
> So now you stand behind the principle that murdering (and that is the
> legal definition of such an act) a 12 year old is valid in order to
> insure that he does not steal another $250 television.  Nice.  This is
> why so many people want to limit gun rights.  Thank you.  You do *our*
> cause wonders.

Yeap. So, you want to limit gun rights so thieves can go on to bigger
things. You're a really good citizen.

>  He doesn't respect you, so why should you respect him?

I don't

> Murder has little to do with respect.

It ain't murder if he's in the act of robbing from the home.




--
Jim

carry on