Article View: dc.talk.guns
Article #2098Re: figures for gun-fetiscists
From: Don Baldwin
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1993 21:46
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1993 21:46
24 lines
1702 bytes
1702 bytes
In article <1993Mar23.191316.15410@clsi.COM> kevin@clsi.com writes:
>> Oh yes it has. My sources? An English friend of mine at work and this
>> month's American Rifleman (NRA monthly) magazine. They have been restricted
> ^^^^^^^^^^
Did you read Peter Theune's mail? He included the UK gun laws, which are
archived (with those of several other countries) at ftp.vmars.tuwien.ac.at,
directory pub/misc/gunlaw.
>Restricted is not the same as banned. If you have a legitimate reason you can
>get most guns.
According to that archive, semi-auto rifles other than .22 rimfire are now
forbidden, had to be turned over to the police for destruction. I wonder
how many people over there had the guts to thumb their nose at such idiocy.
>A desire to shoot tin cans or possible trespassers is not a legitimate reason.
What's wrong with shooting tin cans, as long as you have a safe backstop
and don't do it where the noise will bother people?
Also, what about a trespasser who's coming at you with a crowbar?
don
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<donbC4D357.ECt@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!donbReferences:
<donbC4AyJE.5s7@netcom.com> <1993Mar23.191316.15410@clsi.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10162c,78ab9087c515afbd X-Google-Attributes: gid10162c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1993-03-23 14:12:46 PST Newsgroups: dc.talk.guns Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!netcomsv!netcom.com!donb From: donb@netcom.com (Don Baldwin) Subject: Re: figures for gun-fetiscists Message-ID: <donbC4D357.ECt@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest) References: <donbC4AyJE.5s7@netcom.com> <1993Mar23.191316.15410@clsi.COM> Distribution: usa Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1993 21:46:18 GMT Lines: 24